zaremba
Cricketer Of The Year
So you think that the movie, produced by his brother, with the subtitle "Legacy of a Hero, Story of a Man" and a synopsis which claims that his only crime was to give information to bookies () is likely to give a balanced view and to tell the entire truth?
First of all, no one here has seen the movie yet, but most have seen fit to trash it. Conclusion? None of you know what you're talking about.
Secondly, synopsis means "a BRIEF summary of the plot, etc."
As no one has seen the movie yet, why presume the whole truth isn't shown?
.
I agree generally, and in the broadest sense, that you shouldn't slate a movie that you haven't seen. However I think you need to take a bit of a reality check on this one.