Jesus, sanctimonious much? I think most cricket fans take a fairly dim view of blatant attempts to cheat.Loved seeing AB de Villiers ton up.
What a show of character after the character assassination by the commentators, press, and by those on this very board.
Yeah, I'd go with that. Still it must've taken some ticker to pick himself up after copping the reaction he did and play as well as he has. Shame I missed seeing him bring up the century, what type of reception did he get from the crowd?Jesus, sanctimonious much? I think most cricket fans take a fairly dim view of blatant attempts to cheat.
Aaaaaaand a cancelled game later, I'm back to see this pointless waste of time.And on that note, I'm off to play... again.
Roundly booed except the SA balcony.Yeah, I'd go with that. Still it must've taken some ticker to pick himself up after copping the reaction he did and play as well as he has. Shame I missed seeing him bring up the century, what type of reception did he get from the crowd?
As was mentioned, roundly bood.Yeah, I'd go with that. Still it must've taken some ticker to pick himself up after copping the reaction he did and play as well as he has. Shame I missed seeing him bring up the century, what type of reception did he get from the crowd?
Hoggard ain't going to play, I imagine we can safely say that. Can't believe another few days is going to make much difference on the Jones scenario, but given the complete lack of logic in so many selections of late, you'd not be that surprised if it did. Personally I'd prefer to see him left the whole season, but I can see why you might as well get him in in this series.Pretty obvious that England will lose this match, possibly by an innings. If they keep the same side they'll lose the series, simple as.
Wouldn't mind seeing this side in the next match:
Strauss
Cook
Vaughan
KP
Bell
Shah
Ambrose
Flintoff
Sidebottom/Jones/Hoggard
Anderson
Monty
Mentally soft comments are generally unfounded, but it takes some to start labelling players who've played a whole 2 Tests such.Shah, just what England need - yet another soft mentally dodgy batsman...
Knew it, Panesar the master of flattering statistics while contributing very little.
Show me a match where he has actually took signficant, match changing wickets through good bowling instead of being gifted them through bad batting.
For you, pretty much every wicket-taking spell MSP has gained has been down to bad batting and nothing in the way of good bowling.Show me a match where he has actually took signficant, match changing wickets through good bowling instead of being gifted them through bad batting.
TBF, things haven't really suited England at all. SA have had overwhelmingly the best of the conditions. While selection for this match was abysmal, I don't think it being good would have made much difference once Smith made the right decision at the toss.Im glad they thought a lot about this bowling line-up to get something to suit Headingley and the conditions. Otherwise SA might have piled up the runs
For someone who can bait people better than most others - you sure are easy to annoy with three charactersShow me a match where he has actually took signficant, match changing wickets through good bowling instead of being gifted them through bad batting.
Then I'll show you every match where his fielding and batting has cost England 20-30 runs minimum, plus plenty where you want your spinner to come on and break a partnership and he's failed miserably, and some more where he's had footmarks against left handers and he's bowled complete crap at them.
eH?Harris will be happy he's been hit on his left-hand not his bowling-hand.