Not really. James probably does a better job of making the most of what he has, but Hamish is unquestionably the better player. That brief period of success at the start of his Test career including a hundred on debut against Australia is something I could never imagine James achieving, for example, and the same is probably true of his feats for Gloucestershire since he arrived there.But it's a pretty darn close-run thing,
Which thread would I put it in though? I don't think Hamish and James deserve their own thread in CC TBH.Indeed, AWTA. Move the post to CC FFS, you're a GM!
I'm sure there's a "Bracewell's fascination with the Marshall twins" thread out there somewhere, but a quick search on the Search Feature couldn't find it due to the option's current limited capabilities.Which thread would I put it in though? I don't think Hamish and James deserve their own thread in CC TBH.
Scored 40* on debut iirc.Not really. James probably does a better job of making the most of what he has, but Hamish is unquestionably the better player. That brief period of success at the start of his Test career including a hundred on debut against Australia is something I could never imagine James achieving, for example, and the same is probably true of his feats for Gloucestershire since he arrived there.
He obviously wasn't great but I don't think it's particularly close between he and James.
Yeah, I always forget he played that game against Pakistan for no logical reason.Scored 40* on debut iirc.
Ah yes. Sinclair scored a half century batting 5 IIRC.Indeed it did, when they sent half the first-team (if not even less) there in 2003/04.