He's a joke because he scores runs? That makes no sense.Haha, Lou Vincent is a joke sometimes. Ridiculous to see new ball bowlers as good as Corey Collymore being swung straight for six.
He's a joke for trying those shots whether they worked on this occasion or not.He's a joke because he scores runs? That makes no sense.
Didn't see shot in question as I've only just got back in from rugby, but I've got a sneaking suspicion that if Mahmood had bowled the delivery that was struck for 6 rather than a bowler you like, Vincent wouldn't have been such a joke for playing the shot and infact, the ball would have been utter dross and only got what it deserved.He's a joke for trying those shots whether they worked on this occasion or not.
Jason Lewry's a superb bowler, always absolutely loved him. Such a shame he never attained the consistency or ability to conquer injury to play for England.Jason Lewry seems a fine bowler. Good swing, not afraid to pitch it up and the pace is adequate for county or international (hypothetically) cricket.
At 37, I don't think he's too much of a candidate for the Test team.Jason Lewry seems a fine bowler. Good swing, not afraid to pitch it up and the pace is adequate for county or international (hypothetically) cricket.
Well Mahmood or someone would've been more likely to bowl a dross ball, of course. Vincent is a joke regardless of who's bowling though. It is obviously far more annoying when it's a good bowler like Collymore, needless to say, but Vincent is a joke for playing those shots. No place for them in the First-Class game IMO.Didn't see shot in question as I've only just got back in from rugby, but I've got a sneaking suspicion that if Mahmood had bowled the delivery that was struck for 6 rather than a bowler you like, Vincent wouldn't have been such a joke for playing the shot and infact, the ball would have been utter dross and only got what it deserved.
Life is not a fair place filled with calculations where probability runs strong. Sometimes the length is just correct for a certain shot, the lack of pace allows a batsman to get into the correct shape - several unmeasurables make cricket such a superb game. Mahmood got 5 wickets today, but he could not have bowled absolutely reprihensibly, otherwise he would have gone wicketless. Perhaps it is the talent to rush the batsman, it is not skill, it is not earned but it is very real and can cause mistakes in the batsman - perhaps the wippy action causes an uncertainty in the batsman's stroke which can cause short balls to be chopped on - again, not earned but very real.He's a joke for trying those shots whether they worked on this occasion or not.
Indeed, disappointed I missed it on the radio, fell asleep for like 10 minutesCentury up for ten Doeschate at Chelmsford, as I said earlier much-needed after Essex's top-order mostly collapsed.
Hence the "hypothetically" - far too old for any sort of talk of a Test cap.At 37, I don't think he's too much of a candidate for the Test team.
Bowling excellently, nontheless.
I was suggesting that if it was the exact same ball, but bowled by someone you don't rate, your reaction would be different.Well Mahmood or someone would've been more likely to bowl a dross ball, of course.
Left arm inswing is a tough art, having just become added an inswinger to my armoury myself. Some days you have batsmen leaving balls that pass over middle stump and other days you try the same delivery and it is short and extremely far outside leg stump - either way, I don't get a ****ing wicketJason Lewry's a superb bowler, always absolutely loved him. Such a shame he never attained the consistency
Nah, people do get wickets bowling utter crap, it's not THAT unusual. He did nothing right today, TBH suggestions like "he may be rushing the batsmen" simply smack of seeing good figures and trying to find a reason the bowler deserved them. Which ain't uncommon.Life is not a fair place filled with calculations where probability runs strong. Sometimes the length is just correct for a certain shot, the lack of pace allows a batsman to get into the correct shape - several unmeasurables make cricket such a superb game. Mahmood got 5 wickets today, but he could not have bowled absolutely reprihensibly, otherwise he would have gone wicketless. Perhaps it is the talent to rush the batsman, it is not skill, it is not earned but it is very real and can cause mistakes in the batsman - perhaps the wippy action causes an uncertainty in the batsman's stroke which can cause short balls to be chopped on - again, not earned but very real.
Rant over.
I was suggesting it would've been different in terms of the bowler, but no different in terms of the batsman.I was suggesting that if it was the exact same ball, but bowled by someone you don't rate, your reaction would be different.
There seems to be some sort of problem with the water or something in Lancashire for New Zealanders - Danny Morrison and Nathan Astle couldn't play properly for us eitherHe's a joke for trying those shots whether they worked on this occasion or not.