• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** New Zealand in England

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Well, we've got 4 of the top five who have managed 4 tons in over 150 innings, none of them bowl regularly either (except Shah of course8-), it really shouldn't surprise anyone we're ****e. No doubt our selectors will drop a few bowlers in response to this comphrehensive defeat:@
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
This is so dire. Have keenly followed each match of the series... and then Fox show the decider on delay. Really glad to pay my money for that. Am writing an email. :@
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Well Wright, despite my very drunken cheerleading based on one innings I saw, has proved totally how out of depth he is, with this innings. Vettori hardly clebrated it. If Ambrose follows similarly it could be argued that 6 of the top 7 here, shouldn't be in the side. Shocking.
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Ambrose isn't really an ODI player TBH, Read would be a much better bet IMO.

Yeah Read should never have been dropped from the ODI's, he'd never have gone to the ICl if he had been.

Still, Stuart Broad, in this line-up is probably in our top-three batters, so maybe we shouldn't be so defeatist:unsure:
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Read, Jones, (back to) Read, Nixon, Prior, Mustard, Ambrose. Can't help but feel there haven't been enough 'keepers tried out in the last three years.
 
Last edited:

Top