Where do they get this £5 million prize fund for the 20twenty from then??you have got it backwards.Its the shorter forms of the games that is generating all the money(both T-20 and ODIs).Test cricket is the one which needs money to be "pumped in" and thats not a bad thing if all 3 formats have to survive.
If that's a danger, simply ignore such games completely. As I do with Twenty20.[*]It's over faster: limited overs cricket should end as quickly as possible to prevent people who like real cricket from committing Seppuku.
Long competitions are good when they're well-matched and well-executed.[*]You can have large competitions like WC in a shorter amount of time instead of taking up months
The idea of a game where both sides are always aggressive is something I hate with a passion, hence I hate Twenty20. There must always be a balance between attack and defence for me to enjoy a game. Both sides can be attacking; both sides can be defensive; but if it's just the same all through the game, it has no appeal. The balance has to shift, and the more it shifts the better in fact.[*]I like seeing one side always being aggressive. It is possible for two teams to knock it around for hours in an ODI and both sides come out of it happy, which is not on.
Game-forms are not intelligent beings. They do know know, pretend or anything of that sort.[*]ODI doesn't know what it is, it pretends to be real cricket while being as far away as possible from it. At least T20 is what it is: a bit of hit and giggle
No, not really. The odd few people might do that, but most Twenty20 fans will never, ever be cricket fans. Likewise, a good few fans of the one-day game will never be cricket fans. At least there's less of them though.so at least we can at least agree that t20 will get people into cricket at 1st then may be odi then test...
No, ODIs have been subsidizing Test cricket for two decades now.Surely with all the money being pumped into the shorter formats of the game at the moment I don't see ODI's dying out...
most Twenty20 fans will never, ever be cricket fans. Likewise, a good few fans of the one-day game will never be cricket fans.
I admire you for replying to a post that's five years old, that was made by guy who's long gone from cricket web. Futile, but admirable.
I'm the same.Think most people just want it to be 50 overs because that's what the internationals are. Don't think it's really that different. Personally I prefer 50 overs, but I don't really dislike "the boring middle overs" part, so it wouldn't surprise me if I'm an anomaly.
As am I.I'm the same.