(H)Ivanovic paying 2.20 to win in straight sets. Worth a unit for mine.
She had a great tournament, and should leave quite happy. As you said, experience in the end was the difference.Though the womens final was interesting. Always good to see a new player in a major final and I think Safina did well, difference in the end was Ana's ability to win the big points.
That's borderline madness for a two-horse race, especially when he's such an obvious thoroughbred.Btw, Federer is out to 4.00. Surely some money will come in for him soon.
Refuse to believe God would ever wear a lime-green tee-shirt with no sleeves & a matching bandana, frankly. Nor would he accompany every shot with a grunt of "aaahurghhh!".God on clay wins the first set 6-1.
God wouldn't want to blend in with the crowd.Refuse to believe God would ever wear a lime-green tee-shirt with no sleeves & a matching bandana, frankly. Nor would he accompany every shot with a grunt of "aaahurghhh!".
you cannot discount the fact that nadal has become even better a player especially on clay, i think it is more a case of nadal playing that much better than feds not playing well enough...The match is going just as I expected. In 2006, Roger was very competitive as he was still at his peak, even last year he was competitive too and took it to 4 sets (and even beat Nadal in the Hamburg final on clay before the French started).