**Official** New Zealand in England

[steds]

Your location avoids the filter TBH.

It's an accurate quote. Those were Pat's exact words.

 

[sledger]

Steds > Pat

 

[steds]

Disagree. The hairy-baby-maker is a legend.

 

[sledger]

tbh you could be that hairy if you really wanted to.

 

[Richard]

It's an accurate quote. Those were Pat's exact words.

Aye, but sometimes accurate quotes avoid the filter.

I guess you'll be keeping it until someone removes it though, and that's fair noof.

 

[Prince EWS]

Aye, but sometimes accurate quotes avoid the filter.

I guess you'll be keeping it until someone removes it though, and that's fair noof.

I don't think it avoids the filter if it's a quote. He's legitimately trying to say "feck" there, which avoids nothing.

 

[Richard]

I'd always thought "feck" was avoiding the filter same as it's now been classified as when you replace ec with ar (****), hence I've avoided using it.

If you think not though - no big deal.

 

[Prince EWS]

I'd always thought "feck" was avoiding the filter same as it's now been classified as when you replace ec with ar (****), hence I've avoided using it.

If you think not though - no big deal.

Well it would be if you said it deliberately to get around the filter's treatment of the word "****", but if you're quoting someone that actually said "feck", you're not really avoiding anything, are you?

I don't think words themselves avoid the filter, or they'd just be filtered as well. The context in which you use them comes into it as well, and Steds is not trying to swear or get around the filtration of a word in his location.

 

[Richard]

Haha, well, I'd always thought whether you were quoting or making-up sentences yourself, filter-avoidance was filter-avoidance. I've been told not to do it for instance, when I returned from an absence and there'd been a tightening of the regulations in said absence.

As I say though - I'll leave that to be discussed in the Mod forum.

 

[chalky]

Anyone want to have bet on what James Anderson's Economy rate is going to be this test?

I will go for a very conservative 4.25

 

[Richard]

Somewhere between 3.5- and 4-an-over is all you're getting from me.

 

[steds]

1.37

 

[oitoitoi]

Over 4.

 

[Richard]

1.37

Has he ever conceded that little over the course of ANY game?

 

[Swervy]

Has he ever conceded that little over the course of ANY game?

12 runs in 10 overs vs Australia a few years back...you are talking about Anderson arent you?

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

Has he ever conceded that little over the course of ANY game?

Yes.

EDIT: Darn wireless Internet delay. Grrrr.

 

[aussie]

Prior is a piss poor OD batsman, he's barely good enough to play for Sussex let alone England.

Really?, didn't realize Sussex had so much talent within their ranks...

 

[Richard]

12 runs in 10 overs vs Australia a few years back...you are talking about Anderson arent you?

How on Earth could I forget that one?

 

[Prince EWS]

Haha, well, I'd always thought whether you were quoting or making-up sentences yourself, filter-avoidance was filter-avoidance. I've been told not to do it for instance, when I returned from an absence and there'd been a tightening of the regulations in said absence.

As I say though - I'll leave that to be discussed in the Mod forum.

Ahh, but you were quoting someone saying "****" and had to avoid the filter to get it through how you wanted. When someone says "feck" and you quote it, you don't have to avoid anything.

 

[Leslie1]

I can see that this thread can do with a bit of intervention.

Let's relive (my own upload and edit from SKY) that innings plus a few other nonsensical shot selections.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-83088317296797964&hl=en



GO SOUTHEE!!!