SJS
Hall of Fame Member
No my dear I did not think you were being rude. I just wanted to know for there is a big difference between discussing with those who have seen a player and those who haven't.Not live, but certainly on tape. He was as elegant a batsman as any. I didn't mean to be rude by asking, just that not many pick him as Pakistan's greatest batsman. I would be interested to hear your thoughts on why you consider him better than the three I mentioned.
Zaheer was technically stronger, than Miandad while having all the strokes and the mental toughness (even though he was a gentleman on the field)
He was stronger than Inzy in the head and fitter while having all the strokes Inzy had. He was also not reluctant to bat higher up the order as Inzy without doubt was. His record in one day cricket is remarkable - more so since he played in the early days of the limited overs game. His strike rate in odi's for those times is mind boggling when seen in context with his batting average and this from a very orthodox batsman.
Hanif was technically the best of the lot but played the fewest strokes - not because he couldn't I think. I have seen Hanif play but I was very young. He was the original little master but the position of Pakistan in world cricket, the psychological (inferiority complex) problems the sub-continental people suffered from those early independence-from-colonial-rule years affected him as it did most. He was the Sunil Gavaskar of the times. Holding on to his wicket as a child does to its safety blanket.
But for having seen Zaheer almost all through his fabulous career, I would have gone for Hanif.