The point is, thoug, that Keeds were semis in europe because they spent money tey didnt jave have. bit like if i decided to impress my neighbours by taking out a loan or ten and buying a ferrrair. Leeds paid the true price for their excessive spending~: Jennison myire williams sciored a beayt against them, showed them how the game shld be played. noe come on carlisesle.
Was referring more to the football side of things. They've allowed Gill and Fergie to do their thing. And I care because I'll be going to Old Trafford in the foreseeable future.
Agreed, though it seems unlikely at the moment, him leaving at any stage would be a major problem for Chelsea, one that in all probability would be the end of them.
This is true, they're preferable to the likes of Hicks, however that doesn't make me like them, prices get raised year on year, gradually pricing more and more proper fans out.
Arsenal have the Queensland Rd and Highbury Flats projects being completed pretty soon don't they? Read somewhere that they stand to make upwards of £100-120m from them which will slash a lot of their current debt and that'll clear up a lot of the current stress the club is under financially.
It's a fair point, actually. I'm not party to the financial ins-and-outs, but given our annual income you would assume Wenger must have some money to spend but just prefers to grow his own, as it were. If Hleb goes (as looks likely) it'll be interesting to see if he feels the need to recruit or takes a punt on Walcott getting an extended run.
Nah, the reporting period I linked too isn't up for this year yet; it's the year ending 31/05.
Yep bottled the Scholes decision definately
Hmm. No, on balance, I don't think there's any case that it was. The only debate was intent & he looked to move his arm to the ball for where I sat (which is in front on my telly, obv).