GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
I don't disagree - but wasn't it you who said last week that the best footballers are the best golfers are the best tennis players. I think people are applying the same sort of logic here.In most cases (and I cant say for sure in this one), is that players get paid for club cricket and you dont pay a guy to bowl and only bat in the tail. Club players (especially those with names and reps) have to do it all even in they are crap.
On a different note, there seems to be a logic by many on here that if a guy has the ability to bowl and play Test cricket that he also must have some batting ability. The 2 are unrelated. A guy that bowls in Test cricket can very possibly have the batting ability of a club 4th team scorer.
Martin cant bat. If I played any form of cricket and he batted above me then I would be hitting the roof and I would be a 10/11 at FC level.
As for Anderson, you're probably right, IIRC he couldn't bowl anyway because of his injury, so yeah I'm sure they were just being paid to get game time. But as Nasser Hussain said, "James Anderson only bats 11 because there isn't a lower option available" so I'd be interested in seeing how he got on batting in the top six