That umpiring that got ride of Sarwan (when it looked high) wasn't the most helpful, actually.SL deservedly losing the series, West Indies can count on Umpiring and weather to have helped them here...
Dire. That said, I admire the way you try to hide the fact that you're just a sore loser.I am happy for the West Indians to rejoice here because they will be brought down to earth pretty quickly as the Aussies are getting there next and a thumping from the Aussies is on the cards...so let them celebrate now
and the plumb LBW of Samuels...That umpiring that got ride of Sarwan (when it looked high) wasn't the most helpful, actually.
1 for and 1 against. And Sarwan > Samuels. So how exactly did the umpires favour West Indies? And now you're citing Test matches? Need I remind you of a Mr. Sarwan and Mr. Hinds and the decisions they received when West Indies were in good shape to draw the first Test? But oh, Sri Lanka won that match, so fair enough.and the plumb LBW of Samuels...
I won't go into the numerous ordinary umpiring decisions in the Second Test and ODIs ....I did say SL played ordinarily and deservedly lost the series, but obviously your blinkered eyes missed it completely and went into ranting mode about my being a sore loser...
Really dont know how you can complain about the umpiring when we got a few helpful ones in the 1st test.and the plumb LBW of Samuels...
I won't go into the numerous ordinary umpiring decisions in the Second Test and ODIs ....I did say SL played ordinarily and deservedly lost the series, but obviously your blinkered eyes missed it completely and went into ranting mode about my being a sore loser...
Look man, I was referring to this second ODI which you have to be pretty daft to not admit that weather was a major factor and combined with the Umpiring decisions made it lopsided...And since you brought this issue of Umpiring I thought you needed to be reminded about the Umpiring frailties that contributed to results going way beyond close results....1 for and 1 against. And Sarwan > Samuels. So how exactly did the umpires favour West Indies? And now you're citing Test matches? Need I remind you of a Mr. Sarwan and Mr. Hinds and the decisions they received when West Indies were in good shape to draw the first Test? But oh, Sri Lanka won that match, so fair enough.
Considering the way the West Indies batsmen played Murali I'm not sure about that anymore. It been a long time now, since Murali bowled anywhere near what he is capable of.Would have to pull a couple out against Australia, so it probably won't happen for a good long time yet. And Sri Lanka (with Murali) is still better than West Indies.
I think that's about right. He hasn't bowled well for some time which is why all this talk about 1000+ wickets was ridiculous. He's now number 1 so his motivation to keep going would be diminished quite a bit. His bowling definitely lacked zip in Australia. A key indicator of his motivation might be that he knocked over Ponting a couple of times but didn't take many more wickets. He can still psych himself up for the big fight with a champion like Punter but might be struggling for motivation to knock over the others.Perhaps the great man is finally entering the twilight years of his superlative career?
After all, he is almost 36, been playing since 91/92 (I think Sachin is his only contemporary left), and iirc recently passed 40,000 balls in tests, not to mention the many he has bowled in ODI's or the injuries (especially to his shoulder) he has copped over the years. I think he has a year, perhaps two, left in him. I do hope however, that he goes out on his own terms and does not try to hang on for too long.