Indeed it is, a color. As is ' being in the black ', again a color.But a black hole is black. It's not called a black hole as in a bad hole, or anything, it is a hole that is black.
But the term black eye used in that context is to signify an uncomfortable hit on the subject with the implication being that its pretty ugly for now, but with time there will be a healing process, i.e. the damage done is not terminal, just like a black eye.Indeed it is, a color. As is ' being in the black ', again a color.
' Black eye ' if used to describe color is again OK.
But if used in negative connotations, that dont describe a color, then not so OK.
For example, from reputable Canadian Globe & Mail newspaper, here are some usages :
Parmalat is a black eye for big banks
Black Eye for Baseball (Mitchell report)
It's a black day for the auto sector in Canada
More examples such as black magic or black comedy are used frequently, (at the risk of repeating myself), not necessarily in a racist manner, but out of unawareness/ignorance of their offense.
Sadly, yes.Is it me or has this forum become more interested with discussing Race than Cricket?
I didn't say it was racist alone.Thousands of words out there which have negative connotations if you dig deep enough, but jeez, if we were so obsessed with such things, there would be hardly any English language left.
But this is the way things are going I guess, people scared to use the English language for fear of offending who are looking to be offended.
Back to the issue at hand, seriously, in most parts of the world, referring to someone as being 'black' is not deemed racist (and most definately with the black people I know).
Re: McLaurins comment, there is absolutely no way from reading that article that you can tell what context he was saying that in, so I find it incredible that this has been going on for the last 80 posts on this thread. He was either being terribly pesimistic, or he chose a pretty weak double entendre to make his point....but I am really really struggling tocatch the racist connotations in this.
Nope... not every word will have as much negative connotation as the word "black".... I am sorry, but black is the symbol of everything bad and sad in most cultures around the world. White is the symbol of everything good and pure and black is the obvious opposite. Try and find out if any other color is so universally associated with negative things, then you may have a point.Thousands of words out there which have negative connotations if you dig deep enough, but jeez, if we were so obsessed with such things, there would be hardly any English language left.
But this is the way things are going I guess, people scared to use the English language for fear of offending who are looking to be offended.
Back to the issue at hand, seriously, in most parts of the world, referring to someone as being 'black' is not deemed racist (and most definately with the black people I know).
Re: McLaurins comment, there is absolutely no way from reading that article that you can tell what context he was saying that in, so I find it incredible that this has been going on for the last 80 posts on this thread. He was either being terribly pesimistic, or he chose a pretty weak double entendre to make his point....but I am really really struggling tocatch the racist connotations in this.
I have been saying this all along.. I never once said he meant it in a racist way at all. All I am saying is that what he said has negative and even racist connotations as well, unless taken in the proper context and therefore, he should have been more careful when saying stuff like that. Don't expect the media to take everything in context... They will create a story out of even a single word.Indeed.
TBH, I sometimes find there are people (certainly not Honest, nor most of the respectable posters on this forum, but undeniably people whose unwise words will whip-up undue frenzies) who will look for racist connotations in anything they possibly can, simply for the excuse to make a fuss.
What about "black arts" then or "black magic"?But a black hole is black. It's not called a black hole as in a bad hole, or anything, it is a hole that is black.
When people tell the word "European" is racist.......Is it me or has this forum become more interested with discussing Race than Cricket?
Indeed it is, a color. As is ' being in the black ', again a color.
' Black eye ' if used to describe color is again OK.
But if used in negative connotations, that dont describe a color, then not so OK.
For example, from reputable Canadian Globe & Mail newspaper, here are some usages :
Parmalat is a black eye for big banks
Black Eye for Baseball (Mitchell report)
It's a black day for the auto sector in Canada
More examples such as black magic or black comedy are used frequently, (at the risk of repeating myself), not necessarily in a racist manner, but out of unawareness/ignorance of their offense.
It has negative connotations, but are they necessarily tied to race? A number of people seem to want them to be, but is it necessarily the truth? Or is it simply necessary to remain angry?Black Dress is generally for mourning.
Black Hole are generally points of no return and we often talk about companies and things "going" into a black hole, which means they have no chance of survival or whatever.
Honestly, mate, if you don't think the word "black" has a lot of negative connotations, then I am not sure what I can tell you.
No, what I said was it could be considered "racist" because some people still do tend to refer to Asians as Blacks..... And it could also be considered that he meant that the game will be impacted negatively if the subcontinent took over, indirectly hinting a bit of racist bias......... Most probably, he didn't mean it in either way, but it can be construed to be as racist as Gavaskar's "Europeans" could be.......It has negative connotations, but are they necessarily tied to race? A number of people seem to want them to be, but is it necessarily the truth? Or is it simply necessary to remain angry?
*Sigh*It has negative connotations, but are they necessarily tied to race? A number of people seem to want them to be, but is it necessarily the truth? Or is it simply necessary to remain angry?
If you study the etyomology of some of those words - you will find that some of them are in fact tied to race.It has negative connotations, but are they necessarily tied to race? A number of people seem to want them to be, but is it necessarily the truth?
It is ridiculous comments like this that blow up discussions. It's very easy to dismiss people by calling them angry or bitter - and if you want to come into a discussion with that frame of mind, you might as well stay out. I'm certainly not angry, and neither are most people here - saying something like that just spirals the discussion downward.Or is it simply necessary to remain angry?
Any examples?If you study the etyomology of some of those words - you will find that some of them are in fact tied to race.
The online etymological dictionary has some, but as I spoke with Gelman, I'll try to find a scholarly article that I read a couple years back on it and I'll post it as soon as I find it.Any examples?
I never advocated doing more wrongs for the past injustices... but just that the whole perception of Europeans being racist... its going to take more than 1 or 2 generation for it to go away.And it's the biggest heap of bull**** anyone has ever come-up with. Creating more wrongs in the future does not alter one single thing about wrongs committed in the past. It's a pointless, mind-numbingly stupid attitude, and anyone who perpetuates it is a disgrace to humanity. No exaggeration there.
its easy to say move on... but more harder to do. Like i said its going to take few generations for things to move on.And this attitude is one of the reasons why things don't progress.
Probaly came across bit strong on my part.. sorry for that.WTF? Seriously, where did I mention anything about my "shameful ancestors"? & FWIW, just because I'm English you shouldn't assume all my ancestors are. & are we to infer that you think anyone who isn't European gets a free pass on dodgy statements based on the broadest perceptions of race?
Thank you....... did we see a uproar about this guy's comments in Sub-cont ? I don't think so.....I didn't say it was racist alone.
MacLaurin said "The future (of the game of cricket) is black"...
He was referring to the fact that the subcontinent was becoming the hub of the game.
He was referring to these countries starting to call the shots, as it were. He could have said that as a jig, but it can also be construed that he meant either of the two things:
a. Black meaning the future of the game is bleak, because the subcontinent is going to call the shots from now.
or
b. He could have meant "black" in a racist way, a la Lehmann..... Not impossible given how misinformed and ignorant some of these ppl are reg. the color of Asians.....
Obviously, when taken in the total context of the interview, we might get a better idea of what he actually meant but it doesn't take away the fact that it was a rather irresponsible comment as a man in his position MUST know that words can be taken out of context by the media and played up.......... IF his intent was to just do a pun on an ad, he should have been clearer.