True, that. However, I wasn't actually defending Dyer's actions. I was more describing, through the eyes of another, how Dyer claimed the catch, didn't realise his folly until the slo-mo (see! I admitted he committed a folly!) and wanted to apologise, but couldn't.You were essentially using Waugh's view as your own, which is understandable as you weren't born, but you were defending Dyer. It's not like I can debate Steve Waugh, is it?
It's not like I actually said: "Oh, Greg Dyer was right to claim the catch (followed up with an explanation of why)." That would be defending him. Like you admit, its not like I really can, anyway.
I felt that you were being unfair because you slandered his character based on one single incident. It's not an uncommon thing to do, but I've learnt not to do it. It hurts when it's done to you.
Last edited: