28, right, well that's about what I'd originally thought TBH. You'd have been 10 in 1990\91, pretty impressive that you remember it with such clarity.I'm 28 mate - The chalky is what my mates call me (aparantly I'm the palest man alive). I use it for the all the forums I post on.
No point, neither. It's that or Anderson really has no control over where he's bowling.Anderson bowling short at Martin, very poor form indeed that. Shocking in fact. No excuse whatsoever for bowling short at someone so useless.
Yeah, disappointing for me. Bouncing a bloke who can't defend himself is pretty poor form.What the hell was that bouncer for? Vaughan should have word no need
Looks like Cricket God has punished him with the shame of Martin laying bat on 3 consecutive balls from him. Worse still, a run. No greater shame for a bowler.What the hell was that bouncer for? Vaughan should have word no need
Anderson bowling short at Martin, very poor form indeed that. Shocking in fact. No excuse whatsoever for bowling short at someone so useless.
Don't agree tbh. As one of the commentators said - that's the game these days. Don't come out in the middle if you can't take it.Yeah, disappointing for me. Bouncing a bloke who can't defend himself is pretty poor form.
There's no provision for that. The laws state everyone must bat. Martin is not your usual rabbit, he's truly hopeless. He can't lay bat on 40mph throwdowns. Just bowl full and straight FFS.Don't agree tbh. As one of the commentators said - that's the game these days. Don't come out in the middle if you can't take it.
Don't think he has the control to bowl one TBHSwinging yorker FTW IMO