Pup Clarke
Cricketer Of The Year
Sidebottom ain't been ruled outSo, this for the Test, I guess:
Strauss
Cook
Vaughan*
Pietersen
Collingwood
Bell
Ambrose+
Broad
Hoggard
Harmison
Panesar
Sidebottom ain't been ruled outSo, this for the Test, I guess:
Strauss
Cook
Vaughan*
Pietersen
Collingwood
Bell
Ambrose+
Broad
Hoggard
Harmison
Panesar
With Sidebottom replacing his fellow left-So, this for the Test, I guess:
Strauss
Cook
Vaughan*
Pietersen
Collingwood
Bell
Ambrose+
Broad
Hoggard
Harmison
Panesar
That's a set of rusty row-locks. You would not be getting involved if it was pretty much any other poster here. You're getting involved solely because of 'history' rather than any involvement in this argument.The posts aren't report-worthy. And given I'm another dear old Volts has accused of the same thing, I'm not "getting involed", I'm already involved. It's my prerogative to make such accusations look as ridiculous as I can, because that's what they are.
Ah, it was completely sans-seriousness, was it?You really don't do sarcasm, do you?
See the post above.That's a set of rusty row-locks. You would not be getting involved if it was pretty much any other poster here. You're getting involved solely because of 'history' rather than any involvement in this argument.
And now you're making me feel like a hypocrite by getting involved myself. I suggest that people unconcerned should leave well out.
Pure goldAnyway, I've had enough of disrupting this thread with you and me for now.
And an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. Unless you store a list of all the petty squabbles you've been in for your life like a badge of honour. Its attitudes like this that cause a good number of the wars we see today. People living in the present still celebrate or worship the mistakes made by their Ancestors.The past and the present are not, incidentally, two separate things. One becomes the other.
Strange reaction. I think you may have misunderstood me.But please - don't discuss this issue with me on the forum.
I don't think this is a matter of right vs wrong or one person having the 'correct view'. The relationship between past & present is what you make it to be. Personally, I view them as two divorced entities. The wrongs of the past can be made up for in the present, or things that cannot be made up for should be forgotten about in the fullness of time.Richard said:The past and the present are not, incidentally, two separate things. One becomes the other.
No, you aren't involved. It was a comment that Voltman made towards sledger, that had nothing whatsoever to do with you. There is no need to post on the matter, especially in a way that will only add fuel to the fire, given the history between yourself and Voltman. Quite frankly Richard, people on here would respect you far more if you just shut up sometimes. Now being one of those times. Sadly, I know you don't have the self-restraint not to answer this, and will prove my point.I'm already involved. It's my prerogative to make such accusations look as ridiculous as I can, because that's what they are.
This coming from a person, who posts more frequently than Richard and is likely to reach the 50,000 in a shorter amount of time.No, you aren't involved. It was a comment that Voltman made towards sledger, that had nothing whatsoever to do with you. There is no need to post on the matter, especially in a way that will only add fuel to the fire, given the history between yourself and Voltman. Quite frankly Richard, people on here would respect you far more if you just shut up sometimes. Now being one of those times. Sadly, I know you don't have the self-restraint not to answer this, and will prove my point.
I'd love to get along with you, Flem. Get along allllll night looooooong.Why can't we all just get along?
Oh dear Volty, just couldn't help yourself could you?....I'd love to get along with you, Flem. Get along allllll night looooooong.
"Come over here and show me your nice, creamy throwing arm, Flem..."Oh dear Volty, just couldn't help yourself could you?....
As I've said - this thread's seen enough of this for now. I've made it quite clear that I feel there is need to post on the matter, and you speaking-up for Voltman is as predictable as anything on CW ever has been.No, you aren't involved. It was a comment that Voltman made towards sledger, that had nothing whatsoever to do with you. There is no need to post on the matter, especially in a way that will only add fuel to the fire, given the history between yourself and Voltman. Quite frankly Richard, people on here would respect you far more if you just shut up sometimes. Now being one of those times. Sadly, I know you don't have the self-restraint not to answer this, and will prove my point.