Why? For playing the sport in a fair and noble fashion? I wouldn't have any problem if he walked, but I find it a tad fanatical that you'd dislike it if he did.Even if he had gotten the edge, I'd think less (not more) of him had he walked.
Isn't his knee still playing up?Yuvi, what's wrong with you?
QFT. A more-than-presentable showing from anyone, never mind a teenager touring Australia on his debut. Has been the most consistent bowler for India in my mind.Ishant Sharma - has there ever been a better debut tour of Australia for a teenage bowler?
In fairness, a low base is the starting point. lolCongrats to India, they've really got the wood over the Aussies at the moment.
Looks like being one of the best tri-series in many years.
I wouldn't quite say that, but they've certainly got something about them to trouble the Australians.Congrats to India, they've really got the wood over the Aussies at the moment.
I agree other than to say that - stuff being an umpire everybody hates you and some cricket sides will use their financial power to have you sacked if you make bad decisions against them!The problem is loud and clear, that we don't have enough umpires on the elite panel, the same individuals are officiating in games around the world without getting much of a break...
Indian domestic averages don't mean everything. The quality of Indian domestic fast bowling is generally not so great and pitches are generally in favour of the batsmen. It's more about the temprement when it comes to international cricket. Ganguly never averaged over 50 in domestic cricket as I recall but he is one of the greatest Indian batsmen. Similarly many not so great international Indian batsmen averaged over 50 and sometimes 60 and never capitalised on the International game. I like the look of Rohit Sharma and I think he has a bright future in the Indian side.Is the praise upon R. Sharma all that warranted? Looking at his FC stats and comparing that to others, I wonder why he has been refered to as a 'walk-in once Tendulkar leaves'.etc. Good young player, but when Gambhir, Badrinath, Chopra and co average more than him, it does ask questions.
Character-wise, I've got nothing against cricketers who walk (i.e. Gilchrist) because they've got the right intention. Unfortunately, considering the nature of cricket I think I'd classify walking as "naive and somewhat stupid" rather than "fair and noble". You may disagree, fair enough. Don't really have the time to debate that issue in this thread.Why? For playing the sport in a fair and noble fashion? I wouldn't have any problem if he walked, but I find it a tad fanatical that you'd dislike it if he did.