social
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Is this before or after we restrict cricket to under 6 girls?Time to ban ALL sledging.
Is this before or after we restrict cricket to under 6 girls?Time to ban ALL sledging.
Richardson said it, to be pedantic
Try to draw any line in the sand, and someone will not only step over it - they will piss over it.Banning all sledging is just a knee-jerk reaction and is a pipe dream at best and will never work. I'd much rather players being properly educated in different aspects of various cultures and their sensitivities and a crackdown on abuse with specific rules for what's acceptable and what is not.
There's no way in the world you could tell me that something as innocent as this should be banned.
Before, mate.Is this before or after we restrict cricket to under 6 girls?
Why stop there? Ban people from playing the game. I'm sure there won't be any sledging between robots. All due respect but the notion is fanciful. It's not defeatist, it's acknowledging reality.Time to ban ALL sledging.
Just when I changed my sig, you posted mate....
Raghav's changed it now, which means my previous post now makes even less sense than usual.
No-one is advocating doing nothing. I personally am just saying banning it is pointless.Try to draw any line in the sand, and someone will not only step over it - they will piss over it.
I don't know what the solution is (despite my having a letter on the subject published in The Times last week ), but one thing is certain - doing nothing is no solution at all.
It's the orchestrated nature of sledging that has to stop, and until that happens, the situation will only get worse.Why stop there? Ban people from playing the game. I'm sure there won't be any sledging between robots. All due respect but the notion is fanciful. It's not defeatist, it's acknowledging reality.
You draw the line at what's acceptable and what's not acceptable and regulate from there. This should all be decided and players educated on where the line is. Once we start hauling in Sangas in front of the match referee for stuff like that, we know we have a big problem.Try to draw any line in the sand, and someone will not only step over it - they will piss over it.
I don't know what the solution is (despite my having a letter on the subject published in The Times last week ), but one thing is certain - doing nothing is no solution at all.
Doubt it muchly. Been hearing the same stuff written/spoken/bar burped to me since I've been watching cricket and yet nothing has happened which even remotely resembles that between LIllee and Miandad and;It's the orchestrated nature of sledging that has to stop, and until that happens, the situation will only get worse.
We are very close to players coming to blows - I reckon that will happen in a test match before the end of 2008 unless something is done to rein the nonsense in.
Nah, you're good. But cheers anyway. Looks like saggers has covered me:Just when I changed my sig, you posted mate....
Would you want to me to put my old sig again?
As an aside, in Was It All Cricket? by Daniel Reese he says a South African football team toured Sydney a couple of years after Bodyline with a forward whose surname was actually "Bastard". Apparently the opposition were divided as to whether rag him as "Jardine" or "Larwood".I think Raghav's sig was the mini series version which goes "Which one of you bastards called this bastard a bastard", but I think the accepted one is "Which of you bastards called Larwood a bastard instead of this bastard."
Not sure though, happy to be corrected by Archie etc.
Very clever.I'm sorry Henny PenLE, the sky isn't falling on this one
As an aside, in Was It All Cricket? by Daniel Reese he says a South African football team toured Sydney a couple of years after Bodyline with a forward whose surname was actually "Bastard". Apparently the opposition were divided as to whether rag him as "Jardine" or "Larwood".
They can't hit you if you're standing behind the square leg umpire.I'd throw my full support behind you, I like to see a bit of blood
Harmison could.They can't hit you if you're standing behind the square leg umpire.
Surprised no-one has commented on this tbh.Just saw Clarke's press conference on the news, there's nothing on youtube but there's this from cricinfo (only quotes included):
Sure, I can tell you that. It should be banned. Maybe we can focus on cricket after that.Banning all sledging is just a knee-jerk reaction and is a pipe dream at best and will never work. I'd much rather players being properly educated in different aspects of various cultures and their sensitivities and a crackdown on abuse with specific rules for what's acceptable and what is not.
There's no way in the world you could tell me that something as innocent as this should be banned.
Akin to chopping off ones head to cure dandruff.Sure, I can tell you that. It should be banned. Maybe we can focus on cricket after that.
It'll be a mess for six months until players figure out they should shut the hell up.Akin to chopping off ones head to cure dandruff.
And how will the focus be on cricket when we start prosecuting everyone who utters a peep on the field? It will do much more harm then the alternative, which is a better understanding of different cultures, what's acceptable and unacceptable and attempting to stamp out abuse, not banter and harmless sledging.