So long as you are an Australian fan ...its all ok isn't it...Irony is not lost.
So long as you are an Australian fan ...its all ok isn't it...Irony is not lost.
Wasn't I a South African according to you anyway?So long as you are an Australian fan ...its all ok isn't it...
It certainly isn't when an Australian Cricketer cries "Racism"Irony is not lost.
.. and that has no relevance to what you or I were saying at all, but thanks. I think you just showed us all why you were against Arthur making a statement. It had nothing to do with whether he was distanced from it (as.. umm.. you.. are..) or not - it was what he said.It certainly isn't when an Australian Cricketer cries "Racism"
Yes.Pretty sure Geoff Lawson said something actually/
LOL, if anything reading that piece made me think he is even more guilty.Why should Kumble accept that Harbhajan is being racist when it might have been maa ki (your mother in hindi) and not monkey. Ponting hasn't helped matters by not talking with Kumble and not sorting what looks like might have been a misunderstanding. Read this by Mihir Bose.
totally agree... not intentional but he's not making Ponting look that good... when he did nothing wrong in backing up SymondsLOL, if anything reading that piece made me think he is even more guilty.
Point is: if he said something racist, then there was no simple apology that was going to suffice. The Australians are pretty convinced it was, I don't know why Kumble comes out trying to make Ponting out as if he is stopping the progress. Pretty poor IMO, at the least he should acknowledge what Ponting has had to weigh up.
I probably agree although India have nothing to lose in the next two tests so it won't matter if they have Sehwag, Karthik or Pathan.Would be folly to pick Sehwag on the strength of this knock. Remember Sanath Jayasuriya belted a better bowling attack to all parts of the Adelaide oval and yet come Test time, on an easier wicket to bat on than the WACA looks right now, he not only looked out of his depth but unfit. I fully expect Sehwag to do the same. Love watching him when he's going but picking him now isn't doing the right thing by him or the team because if he fails, the team are all going to be saying "See? What's he doing here?!" and if he then gets dropped again soon after, what will that do to his confidence? He might never get picked again.
I'd stick with the same order. The Indian selectors picked them, now bloody back them. On a Perth-type deck, I'd back Yuvraj to come good with at least a half ton. He's shown too much form of late to drop him after a couple of failures. He's a special player, just needs one start and I reckon he'll be away. Andy Symonds was similar, really; unorthodox player who's woefully under-performed relative to talent. The selectors backed him a little bit further than they probably could have justified (especially in ODI's before 2003) and look where he is now (numerous let-offs notwithstandaing ).
I'm more referring to the batting. In terms of the bowling, for mine Pathan strikes me as the perfect bowler to bowl into the Fremantle Doctor. A bowler who swings the ball at around medium-fast pace is always dangerous post-tea at the WACA. They might want to consider finding a place for him, perhaps for Harbhajan.I probably agree although India have nothing to lose in the next two tests so it won't matter if they have Sehwag, Karthik or Pathan.
1st being 05 Ashes or 07 WC?Edit: This thread is already the second biggest official thread in CC history and only half way through the series as well.
Yeah Ashes 05 had nearly 16 thousand whilst Ashes 06/07 (15,000) and WC (32,000) had separate forums and different threads for different matches/stages. Those two are now archived.1st being 05 Ashes or 07 WC?
Heh, he'd still contribute more than Yuvi does and he can roll his arm over if needed tooUgh, Irfan is cannon fodder. We don't need an extra bowler, if we are going to bring someone in for Yuvraj, it has to be an opener so Dravid can go back to his #3 spot.