***Official*** India in Australia

[Flem274*]

hang on you just spent last night going on about how difficuilt it is for people living in india because they dont have the infastracture and money that people do in australia, so it looks like india need every dollar they can get

In india 99% of the population is piss poor. 1% have it all. These 1% are the blokes thatare using their financial influence in cricket for their own benefit.

I'm still bitter about Bondy.

 

[aussie_26]

People in India. Not the cricket board. They have plenty of money. The actual people there don't.

any money that goes to people in india is good, the richer the indian board gets the more money that they will spend back into the india.

 

[Matt79]

Yep, it's the umpires fault and they handed you the game. Your players don't walk when belting it to slip and claim catches when they have either been dubious or clearly been grounded, and it's not possible that Ishant didn't make a mistake in the heat of the moment?

They're pissed off at Proctor because on the face of it he seems to have taken the word of your players over ours despite there being no other evidence.

It may be slightly extreme, but their stance is absolutely understandable.

Until his report is out, it can't be ruled out that Symonds was a clearer, more credible witness than Bhajji, hence Proctor's decision.

 

[Flem274*]

any money that goes to people in india is good, the richer the indian board gets the more money that they will spend back into the india.

Wrong. The richer the BCCI gets the richer the BCCI gets. The poor stay poor.

 

[Johnners]

http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal...s-tour-to-australia-in-jeopardy_10011616.html

Well thats certainly different to what you said. SRT saying the ban was unjustified bears no recollection to the twaddle you posted.

harbhajan is absolutely innocent and that he was not heard properly at the ICC hearing by proctor.
If sachin who was standing closest to harbhajan and who is the the longest serving international cricketer has his testimony ignored while Clarke and haydens are accepted then

 

[duffer]

any money that goes to people in india is good, the richer the indian board gets the more money that they will spend back into the india.

They don't. That's another problem India faces, rampant corruption.

 

[Cevno]

9 or 10 "???
I guarentee he has given more than 9 or 10 poor decisions against australians in his career.

Seems like India did pretty well with the umps a few months ago.
EDIT wrong link

I said 9 or 10 blatant ones which even kid can tell.
He gave sachin out in his 100th test without even razzaq appealing .
Last time we toured here ganguly in his report gave him zero points and a damning description..
If i counted all wrong ones then we are talking about atleast easily over 200 dismissals.

 

[duffer]

Until his report is out, it can't be ruled out that Symonds was a clearer, more credible witness than Bhajji, hence Proctor's decision.

Yep, that's why I said on the face of it. We need to get a full understanding behind the decision. Problem is, if it's such a clear cut decision why are the Indian management so furious about it?

 

[aussie_26]

They don't. That's another problem India faces, rampant corruption.

what they get all this money and than do nothing with it? lets just say you were earning millions of dollars a year, your not going to do nothing with it are you

 

[Cevno]

Well thats certainly different to what you said. SRT saying the ban was unjustified bears no recollection to the twaddle you posted.

harbhajan is absolutely innocent and that he was not heard properly at the ICC hearing by proctor.
If sachin who was standing closest to harbhajan and who is the the longest serving international cricketer has his testimony ignored while Clarke and haydens are accepted then

That article only mentions few points.It is being fully reported on Indian TV.

 

[tooextracool]

Ponting has matured greatly since 2005. Few will debate that.

I will debate it. What sort of convincing argument do you have to suggest that he has matured since 2005? Given that we were led to believe that Ponting 'matured way back after his 1998 incident in India and every year thereafter we've heard stories of, Oh our little legend Ponting has matured over the last year or so only for him to behave like an absolute toddler in front of the public, year after year after year. There is no evidence to suggest that the Ponting with double standards from the India series in 04 or the Ashes in 05 is no longer a jack***. If anything this test has reconfirmed most people's beliefs.

 

[duffer]

what they get all this money and than do nothing with it? lets just say you were earning millions of dollars a year, your not going to do nothing with it are you

They don't use it to help people like you think they would.

 

[Flem274*]

what they get all this money and than do nothing with it? lets just say you were earning millions of dollars a year, your not going to do nothing with it are you

Oh they use it. Big mansions, fast cars, pacific islands and a splash of NZ fast bowlers

 

[Matt79]

Is Ricky dobbing again?

Post reported for trolling. Stop trying to whip up trouble and go take a cold shower.

 

[James]

We still get cheated in hockey(the rule change such as offside and astro-turf and horrific umpiring ) but do not have clout there and in many sports.
It is not as if aussies are not using there clout in swimming and other olympic sports against so why should India not in cricket against injustice.(aussies have history of using clout unneccesarily also)
Btw, there is talk by one journalist that if Icc do not retry harbhajan case ,a no-confidence motion could be tabled against Malcom speed as he was the one who criticised proctor for not punishing yuvraj while not criticising ponting and lee for the same.

Have nothing to do with the topic being discussed. Keep on topic please.

 

[vic_orthdox]

Is Ricky dobbing again?

You've received numerous warnings, and poked your tongue out at them by putting one of them in your signature. If all you are here to do is make petty insults and try and stir trouble, I suggest you post somewhere else.

 

[Johnners]

That article only mentions few points.It is being fully reported on Indian TV.

How convenient for you.

 

[vic_orthdox]

We still get cheated in hockey(the rule change such as offside and astro-turf and horrific umpiring ) but do not have clout there and in many sports.
It is not as if aussies are not using there clout in swimming and other olympic sports against so why should India not in cricket against injustice.(aussies have history of using clout unneccesarily also)
Btw, there is talk by one journalist that if Icc do not retry harbhajan case ,a no-confidence motion could be tabled against Malcom speed as he was the one who criticised proctor for not punishing yuvraj while not criticising ponting and lee for the same.

Administration of other sports isn't relevant at all to the topic at hand.

 

[aussie_26]

They don't use it to help people like you think they would.

they might not be giving it to charity be they use that money to buy things, which menas they are pumping lots of money back into the indian ecnomy

 

[Flem274*]

they might not be giving it to charity be they use that money to buy things, which menas they are pumping lots of money back into the indian ecnomy

You mean Ferraris, the best European designers and oil from the arabic countries? Nope, that money doesn't go into the Indian economy.