Is this Out???

[Mister Wright]

I'd give the batsman not out, for immagination.

 

[whitedazzler]

Out obstructing the field.
Otherwise, next thing you know, the batsman could be pouring CrazyGlue on the bails

agreed

 

[Perm]

Plenty far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far more arseholeish cricketers than Jacques Henry. Matthew Hayden, for one.

Just because you don't like seeing him score runs and don't think he's very good doesn't make him an arsehole.

 

[Lillian Thomson]

Just because you don't like seeing him score runs and don't think he's very good doesn't make him an arsehole.

If you'd constantly rubbished such a consistantly high quality performer and had to keep coming up with spurious arguments to avoid admitting you were wrong you would probably think he was an arsehole too.

 

[Nate]

I'd give the batsman not out, for immagination.

Might as well go the whole turkey and award six. Or at least five penalty runs for the bowlinig side not thinking of it first.



...you're alright Wright. You're alright.

 

[SirBloody Idiot]

If you'd constantly rubbished such a consistantly high quality performer and had to keep coming up with spurious arguments to avoid admitting you were wrong you would probably think he was an arsehole too.

 

[Richard]

Just because you don't like seeing him score runs and don't think he's very good doesn't make him an arsehole.

He's an arsehole besides not being very good. The two are unrelated.

If you'd constantly rubbished such a consistantly high quality performer and had to keep coming up with spurious arguments to avoid admitting you were wrong you would probably think he was an arsehole too.

I didn't come-up with the arguments to avoid admitting I was wrong; I formed the non-wrong opinion on the basis of the non-spurious arguments.

 

[Perm]

He's an arsehole besides not being very good. The two are unrelated.

How is he an arsehole?

 

[Lillian Thomson]

He's an arsehole besides not being very good. The two are unrelated.

I didn't come-up with the arguments to avoid admitting I was wrong; I formed the non-wrong opinion on the basis of the non-spurious arguments.

Yet another pile of crap........and coincidently Matty has just made yet another century.............karma at work.

 

[Richard]

How is he an arsehole?

The arrogant sort of persona he tends to convey, simple as.

 

[Richard]

Yet another pile of crap........and coincidently Matty has just made yet another century.............karma at work.

Nah, makes no difference to any timing of any sort. Nor did I think it remotely unlikely he'd score a century in the currently ongoing match, as I haven't for most of the last 5 years or so.

 

[Lillian Thomson]

The arrogant sort of persona he tends to convey, simple as.

Did someone mention a pot and a dirty kettle? As least he has something to be arrogant about.

 

[Richard]

Did someone mention a pot and a dirty kettle?

No.

 

[Mister Wright]

Might as well go the whole turkey and award six. Or at least five penalty runs for the bowlinig side not thinking of it first.



...you're alright Wright. You're alright.

Ah...Forum Love, the best kind?

 

[Son Of Coco]

The arrogant sort of persona he tends to convey, simple as.

Whereas Jacques conveys the persona of a happy go lucky roustabout! He is South African though...arrogance is a given

 

[HeathDavisSpeed]

The arrogant sort of persona he tends to convey, simple as.

I guess you know this from personal experience. From my personal experience of Matthew Hayden, he's a top guy despite any persona (arrogant or otherwise) that he may exude on the field.

Andrew Symonds on the other hand

 

[Richard]

Well obviously I don't know Hayden off the field, and I don't really need to nor care either.

 

[Richard]

Whereas Jacques conveys the persona of a happy go lucky roustabout!

Does he?