Turbinator
Cricketer Of The Year
India Rulez! WoooT!
Haha, took the bait.![]()
By the way, I don't hate Warne, far from it as I rank him as the second best Test bowler of all time. However, I find the unprecedented extent to which many of his fans try to discredit Murali and his legacy based on little more than conjecture about his action utterly repulsive. And the fact that its all in support of a man with as many digressions as Warne makes it all the more repulsive to me.
The problem with that idea though, is that you as a moderator have a duty to I don't know... maybe moderate the forum? And I dare say a beevsesque ignore list would definitely hamper you in your ability to do that.Speaking as a member, personally, I am tired of putting up with people like that. I am going back and finding every member who consistently does that towards a player/team/whatever, and simply putting them on my ignore list (and Murali is just one of about six topics that constantly annoy me in the forum). It's about to swell from three people to twenty, but I see no other way. I highly suggest that others on the forum (on all sides) do the same, rather than taking the bait and helping to ruin the thread.
That's one hell of a list you must have got there.Archie Mac - Welcome to my Ignore list.
Mate (not meant nicely), I think thats the first personal attack I have delivered on CW in almost 900 posts and 3 1/2 years on the forum.Much better argument, although very personel which seems to be you style![]()
Mate (not meant nicely) I will stack my cricket knowledge against yours any day of the week, the difference being I show respect to other posters on this forum, and always attack the post and never the person.
Not sure how old you are but if it is over 12 then you have a lot of growing up to do![]()
Mate (not meant nicely), I think thats the first personal attack I have delivered on CW in almost 900 posts and 3 1/2 years on the forum.
My style? Wtf do you know about it?
And theres knowledge and theres knowledge - the point is, on this topic you seem to lack any, seem disinclined to research it, and seem unable to argue about it (beside constantly proferring your opinion). If you really want to know there are quite a few reasonable arguments you could make on this, ideally on the correct thread. Too bad you have never exhibited any of it (despite your vaunted so called 'knowledge').
As for calling me what 12? Arent you the guy who pops up on any Murali thread that comes up, and makes rather snide usually one line comments complete with roll eyes smilies and then exits stating that it is all your "opinion". You are like a guy who mutters something under his breath and when called up on it says "I didnt say nuthin". Pathetic and juvenile. Come to that, how old are you? 40 something? Maybe its time you started to act like it.
If you have nothing to say, and it really seems like you dont, then dont say it.
In other words, either man up or shut up and shove it.
Edit/ Done with this thread.
That's one hell of a list you must have got there.
You must understand you can not say anything bad about the Murali action in this thread because it is a tribute thread, you can't say anything about Murali in the other thread because in the first post the thread starter asked people do not mention it
I am wondering in the next Murali thread started what the reason will be?
'Don't mention his action in this thread because it is Murali's birthday this month' Or the 100th post in this thread requested no more mention of his action'![]()
Too Precious these Murali supporters me thinks![]()
The one point which I do find rather distateful is that if you happen to be from Australia and question Murali's action, often other posters will say "you're just jealous because he's taken over from Warne", which frankly is poppycock. It's as fair a comment as me saying "you only think his action is ok because you're from the subcontinent".Exactly.
My post was only a reply to someone WHO HAD ALREADY RAISED HIS ACTION in this thread.
Top Cat's only rebuttal of my main point (that the laws were changed just to accommodate Murali) were that that theory was too conspiratorial, which itself is not really any sort of a convincing argument.
My other point is that if you dare raise his action, it's almost like you're treated as a big, red-neck bully, whereas if you give his action a tick you are somehow a gracious, sporting gentleman.
By the way, nowhere did I say that under the current, altered laws, his action is illegal.
Exactly.
My post was only a reply to someone WHO HAD ALREADY RAISED HIS ACTION in this thread.
Top Cat's only rebuttal of my main point (that the laws were changed just to accommodate Murali) were that that theory was too conspiratorial, which itself is not really any sort of a convincing argument.
My other point is that if you dare raise his action, it's almost like you're treated as a big, red-neck bully, whereas if you give his action a tick you are somehow a gracious, sporting gentleman.
By the way, nowhere did I say that under the current, altered laws, his action is illegal.
I used the word precious and I think it correct tbh. I also agree under the new rules he is okay except for the doosra every now and again. The name calling is one thing; moron, idiot, old (that made me laugh), but I hate when it is suggested that it is only because of Warne that Aussies have a concern with the Murali actionThe one point which I do find rather distateful is that if you happen to be from Australia and question Murali's action, often other posters will say "you're just jealous because he's taken over from Warne", which frankly is poppycock. It's as fair a comment as me saying "you only think his action is ok because you're from the subcontinent".
Each as meaningless as the other, imo. And both pretty damn insulting.
No, the rebuttal is that they were changed because everyone chucked, except Sarwan. But people don't keep ignoring this, and I don't know why.howardj said:Top Cat's only rebuttal of my main point (that the laws were changed just to accommodate Murali) were that that theory was too conspiratorial, which itself is not really any sort of a convincing argument.
What I was thinking too. You're not just a member Mr. S.The problem with that idea though, is that you as a moderator have a duty to I don't know... maybe moderate the forum? And I dare say a beevsesque ignore list would definitely hamper you in your ability to do that.
Damn it, I hate it when I don't listen to my own advice.
If you take a poll of cricket fans, I bet a much larger percentage of Australians would say that he chucks compared to other countries. And a much larger percentage of Sri Lankans will say that he does not. It does not take an Einstein to figure out why in either of those cases. That's just a fact of life.
.
Quoting Richard's post as it expresses the reasons why we've said (the mods) so many times in the past, why these sort of topics should be kept clear of Murali-is-a-chucker.You've gotta realise, mate, that most people are sick to death 300 times over of the Murali-is-a-chucker brigade.
The fact that it almost invariably intrudes on other things regarding him - and there is much interesting to be discussed about him - is deeply frustrating of times.
It should be said that I did not start the name callingHey guys what happened here ? A blood bath ? Over what ?
I am shocked to see two of the nicest (and coolest in every sense of the term) guys on the CW getting so worked up. Sad.
![]()
Now that's the Archie we know (nice and mature)It should be said that I did not start the name calling![]()
But it should also be said that I am old enough to not get involved in such silly slanging matches![]()
So sorry to all of those I have managed to upset in this thread (too many to list) but especially a certain member from NZ; JBH001, I have read a lot of your posts and certainly agree with most of your comments and when I don't agree most of them are very well expressed![]()
So anyway well done Murali![]()