MSP for mine.. Harbhy outside india fairly uselesseven Harbhajan, over MSP at the moment.
MSP for mine.. Harbhy outside india fairly uselesseven Harbhajan, over MSP at the moment.
Bryce McGain has no business being anywhere near a Test side.McGain as the bolter for the 4th bowler if he can produce one more good performance.
Um, MSP averages 46 away from home. And he has only played on two tours - what makes you think he is any better?MSP for mine.. Harbhy outside india fairly useless
I just have to ask TBH... are these 3 or 4 people who've mentioned him actually serious? Or is it just some elaborate wind-up-act?Lol has anybody in the media even mentioned McGains name as a possible dark horse?, or is it just us.
Thought he was Danish TBH.Bryce McGain has no business being anywhere near a Test side.
He's Victorian.
He is originally. But that wouldn't offend Matt anywhere near as much.Thought he was Danish TBH.
Kerry O'Keefe has. Before anyone on this forum, in fact.Lol has anybody in the media even mentioned McGains name as a possible dark horse?, or is it just us.
I think I was the first to mention him seriously and I stand by it. Best spinner in the country after MacGill who clearly isn't fit and is in terrible form anyway. He doesn't actually have much of a realistic chance of being picked IMO, but if my hands were tied and I had to pick a spinner - based on bowling alone - for the tests against India, he'd be it.I just have to ask TBH... are these 3 or 4 people who've mentioned him actually serious? Or is it just some elaborate wind-up-act?
Thought he was Danish TBH.
I don't expect, TBH, that India will win any games. But they've a more than decent chance of avoiding defeat - even an outside chance of avoiding defeat in all 4 Tests - if they bat as they can.India are seriously screwed if guys like Zaheer and RP don't get fit soon... As it is, I am expecting a bit of a thrashing for us down under but with these guys out, 4-0 will just be a formality, I reckon.
Just for the Tests against India, though, yeah? 35-year-old debutants are, obviously, highly irregular. Added to the fact that he doesn't seem to have done anything of note until this season. Surprises me that anyone'd be terribly keen on him, even if it were only a short-term option.I think I was the first to mention him seriously and I stand by it. Best spinner in the country after MacGill who clearly isn't fit and is in terrible form anyway. He doesn't actually have much of a realistic chance of being picked IMO, but if my hands were tied and I had to pick a spinner - based on bowling alone - for the tests against India, he'd be it.
This is a good squad but I feel that there are one or two errors and one or two interesting moves.cricinfo said:24 probables for Australia tour: Anil Kumble, Mahendra Singh Dhoni, Wasim Jaffer, Dinesh Karthik, Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman, Yuvraj Singh, Sourav Ganguly, RP Singh, Munaf Patel, Zaheer Khan, VRV Singh, Pankaj Singh, Ishant Sharma, Murali Kartik, Harbhajan Singh, Piyush Chawla, Aakash Chopra, Gautam Gambhir, Ranadeb Bose, Irfan Pathan, Ajit Agarkar, Parthiv Patel.
Why not just go for an extra pacer? If I was an Australian selector, I'd go that route, even if MacGill was fully fit. He hasn't done that well against India in the past, when he was much closer to his prime. If fit, you could field an attack of Lee, Tait, Johnson, and Clark, or something like that. The opening partnership of Lee-Tait could conceivably blast through the Indian top order very quickly, and especially an inexperienced opener like Karthik. And Clark is a smart accurate bowler that can trouble anyone in the Indian lineup. Johnson combines a bit of both. I'd love to see that lineup in action, even though I'm an Indian fan.I think I was the first to mention him seriously and I stand by it. Best spinner in the country after MacGill who clearly isn't fit and is in terrible form anyway. He doesn't actually have much of a realistic chance of being picked IMO, but if my hands were tied and I had to pick a spinner - based on bowling alone - for the tests against India, he'd be it.
Amen to that. I've been saying that for the longest time. He may or may not be successful at the Test level with his pace (around 128-132), but we know Agarkar won't be successful. I don't see a reason for that move.Manee said:I would have liked to see Gagandeep Singh (will he ever get selected?), who has the brilliant domestic average of 20.31 and strike rate of 48.6 and...
Hmm, TBH it worries me that a bowler like him would seriously get wickets so quickly in Indian domestic cricket. I've seen a fair few of his spells, in long and short form, and so far he's honestly been one of the worst bowlers I've ever seen at the international level. How on Earth he can trouble batsmen with First-Class averages in the 50s is beyond me.Picking VRV Singh on bouncy Australian wickets is a good, ambitious move but he must work very hard to combat his no ball problems (about 0.75 an over) which is a reason that his domestic economy is so high. His incredibly low domestic strike rate (especially if you minus his Tests) is proof of his unique wicket taking talent but he must be properly harnessed.
If you popped your head over to the bottom right, you'd see that he consistantly bowls full balls at 88mph and short balls are around 80mph. Taking into account that Indian batsmen are infamously poor against short bowling and that VRV can get balls to rise viciously, it is no mystery how he picks up wickets at domestic level, with rising short ones and quick full ones.Hmm, TBH it worries me that a bowler like him would seriously get wickets so quickly in Indian domestic cricket. I've seen a fair few of his spells, in long and short form, and so far he's honestly been one of the worst bowlers I've ever seen at the international level. How on Earth he can trouble batsmen with First-Class averages in the 50s is beyond me.
I will be very disappointed if VRV makes his way back into the Indian team unless, of course, injury to others leaves no choice.Hmm, TBH it worries me that a bowler like him would seriously get wickets so quickly in Indian domestic cricket. I've seen a fair few of his spells, in long and short form, and so far he's honestly been one of the worst bowlers I've ever seen at the international level. How on Earth he can trouble batsmen with First-Class averages in the 50s is beyond me.
I'll throw my hat in with the McGain brigade as someone who should at least be looked at (and it be made public that he's being looked at to see if his form holds or it falls apart like Brad Hodge...... oh no he didn't!). McGain rips the ball miles and the times I've seen him bowl, he's been very hard to score off as well as attacking. One of those guys who seems to be sometimes economical, sometimes not but always looking like taking a wicket.Just for the Tests against India, though, yeah? 35-year-old debutants are, obviously, highly irregular. Added to the fact that he doesn't seem to have done anything of note until this season. Surprises me that anyone'd be terribly keen on him, even if it were only a short-term option.
Jenner has....Lol has anybody in the media even mentioned McGains name as a possible dark horse?, or is it just us.