1-9-7-7
International Regular
Trouble.Give what?
Trouble.Give what?
Not acknowledging that one needs improvement |= not needing it.That's because he doesn't.
It probably is. Perhaps the only reason I haven't been banned is because James is away. We'll see what happens when he gets back.Telling someone to go and die is infinitely worse than many of the joke bannings that have occured before. The thread was pointless, ok, but some of the stuff flying around was disgusting.
But it just seems like people are fighting for the sake of fighting.I understand all the hate in that thread.
Waughney hasn't posted in ages. Most people here don't even remember him, so the chances of them having talked to him are slim-to-nil.
If Richard's going to start Birthday threads, on his own whims and preferences, for inactive posters who nobody remembers, he may as well do it over e-mail or MSN, tbh. Loads of people have expressed their dislike over his birthday threads, particularly for inactive posters. He'd have done well to take those opinions on-board by now.
But he still reads the forum.Waughney hasn't posted in ages.
You obviously feel there wasn't. I felt there was a need for my response.Trouble.
I hope to god thats sarcasm.You obviously feel there wasn't. I felt there was a need for my response.
Quite right. In Voltman's case his on-forum behaviour has been good, with a lot of humour that you seemingly don't appreciate.Not acknowledging that one needs improvement |= not needing it.
Flem, I've never told you this before, but Perm is your half-brother, from an illicit one-night stand I had with Langeveldt when I was in the army and stationed in Siberia.This is an online soap opera.
I did edit my post to say I agree that things did get awfully out of hand out there.But it just seems like people are fighting for the sake of fighting.
So what he has his birthday threads.
Just ignore it ffs.
It'll be off page 1 in a day.
And if you counted the amount of people, bar you, who were interested in that particular point, on one hand, you'd still have five fingers left.Richard said:But he still reads the forum.
It may have been a bit harsh, but I think it got the message across.I hope to god thats sarcasm.
Humour =| good behaviour.Quite right. In Voltman's case his on-forum behaviour has been good, with a lot of humour that you seemingly don't appreciate.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFlem, I've never told you this before, but Perm is your half-brother, from an illicit one-night stand I had with Langeveldt when I was in the army and stationed in Siberia.
*dramatic orchestral music*
Thought that wasFlem, I've never told you this before, but Perm is your half-brother, from an illicit one-night stand I had with Langeveldt when I was in the army and stationed in Siberia.
Fair enough, didn't see the edit when I posted.I did edit my post to say I agree that things did get awfully out of hand out there.
Four if we don't count thumbs.I did edit my post to say I agree that things did get awfully out of hand out there.
And if you counted the amount of people, bar you, who were interested in that particular point, on one hand, you'd still have five fingers left.
A bit?It may have been a bit harsh, but I think it got the message across.
IYO, which is rather biased. I don't think too many others have any issues with him. Certainly not as many as those that dislike you.Voltman's behaviour =| good
Wrong - very wrong.IYO, which is rather biased. I don't think too many others have any issues with him. Certainly not as many as those that dislike you.