seconded...There have been better ODI players for Australia in the past and there are a couple in the current team who I'd rate higher. Odd decision.
I don't think there's such thing as an 'unbeatable' side. But boy does that one go close!Not sure about the decision but the votes were pretty convincing. What a team though!
Gilchrist, Mark Waugh, Ponting, Jones, Steve Waugh, Bevan, Symonds, Warne, Lee, Lillee, McGrath
That is a truly great side. Symonds at 7 in a one day side - it's almost laughable.Not sure about the decision but the votes were pretty convincing. What a team though!
Gilchrist, Mark Waugh, Ponting, Jones, Steve Waugh, Bevan, Symonds, Warne, Lee, Lillee, McGrath
The same could be said for Symonds and Symonds standard of fielding adds a lot more to the team that Gilchrist's wicket-keeping. Plus he bowls. It's so weird to think that Symonds could be Australia's greatest ever ODI payer after being so useless for so long but the way he's turned around his game has been amazing. That innings against Pakistan in the 03 WC will live long in the memory as one of the most extraordinary individual performances. Symonds has a world cup average of 103 from 18 matches. Gilchrist has an average of 36 ish from 31 matches. He's scored one century in that time - in the final. As an opener I don't think that's good enough.Fair call for mine. Easily the greatest ODI wicketkeeper in history, and arguably the best ODI opener ever. You can argue against him because of his statistics or whatever, but the fact is, Adam Gilchrist scares teams like no other player scares them. What he does goes beyond simple statistics. If he's been out there for more than 70 balls, chances are you've already lost the game. A player who can simply take the game away from you so quickly, and perform right when it matters. Truly a magnificent player, and I think he's entirely deserving of such a high honour.
You're trying to measure his worth in pure statistics, which I think is kinda ridiculous. That said, an average of 36 from 31 matches at the rate he scores them is hardly anything to be ashamed of.The same could be said for Symonds and Symonds standard of fielding adds a lot more to the team that Gilchrist's wicket-keeping. Plus he bowls. It's so weird to think that Symonds could be Australia's greatest ever ODI payer after being so useless for so long but the way he's turned around his game has been amazing. That innings against Pakistan in the 03 WC will live long in the memory as one of the most extraordinary individual performances. Symonds has a world cup average of 103 from 18 matches. Gilchrist has an average of 36 ish from 31 matches. He's scored one century in that time - in the final. As an opener I don't think that's good enough.
No I'm not, I was just pointing out what I found to be interesting stats, not suggesting they summed the entire story up. I'm surprised by the choice but I certainly don't begrudge him his title and can see that he has an aura that very few other players have. I do however feel that Gilly has tended to under-perform on the one-day stage and his true wroth is in test cricket. And I do think that by the end of Symond’s career many will judge him as Australia's greatest ever OD cricketer.You're trying to measure his worth in pure statistics, which I think is kinda ridiculous. That said, an average of 36 from 31 matches at the rate he scores them is hardly anything to be ashamed of.
Yeah, agree. I have immense respect for Bevan as a player, and indeed think he should be named in our Best ODI XI of all time, but he quite simply didn't scare the opposition the way Gilly did. He couldn't win you a match the way Gilly did. When it came to knocking around 1s and 2s at the end of the innings, there was no finer. However, this didn't scare teams...I doubt many captains woud've been too concerned about it honestly. It doesn't win you matches.I am one of those who agrees with the choice. Moreover, not having Bevan in the top three Australian all time odi' players gives me some satisfaction. I have had quite a few debates on the merits of calling Bevan the greatest ODI player of all time purely on the basis of his average in that format. Its gratifying to see that a jury consisting of all Australians ever to play in odi's agrees so emphatically.
Shows that at least those who play the game are not swayed by pure statistics and thank God for that.
I am sure they took that into consideration too plus his keeping.i wonder if they took into consideration that Gilly has hit 54, 54 and 149 in WC finals.. pretty good feat