neville cardus
International Debutant
Why?I would take Tiger over Hollywood, but hey that is just me
Why?I would take Tiger over Hollywood, but hey that is just me
In England, especially, he'd've been unstoppable in the 'fifties.Wonder how the living XI would have done in each of the era's that they missed that the dead XI played in. Murali playing 60 years ago, wonder how he would've done.
I was being facetious. And yes, there is evidence that he couldn't, but that's hardly the point.Any basis for that?
What is the point, then? I think that what you've set down there could make for a fascinating argument; don't avoid it.I was being facetious. And yes, there is evidence that he couldn't, but that's hardly the point.
Point is I'd take him and take a chance on the weather.What is the point, then? I think that what you've set down there could make for a fascinating argument; don't avoid it.
Ray "silentstriker" Robinson.Point is I'd take him and take a chance on the weather.
If that's Alan Davidson...I'm pretty sure he's still knocking about.Dead XI:
Hobbs
Hutton
*Bradman
Headley
Trumper
Miller
+Ames
Davidson
Marshall
Barnes
O'Reilly
Yup. Still hale & hearty in his late 70s, somewhat ironically perhaps given his hypochondria as a player.If that's Alan Davidson...I'm pretty sure he's still knocking about.
Wow, I did not know that your species existed. I thought it was completely unanimous that Marshall was by far the best quick ever to have lived.TBH,they're pretty close,I rate Mrshall the third ever which puts him behind Imran & Hadlee.
Yes a Pak fan but you shouldn't jump to making opinions about persons that quickly.I might be a great fan of Imran but I'm also the person who criticizes Pakistan team & bash the players the most.Spend more time here & you'd come to know that I have fairly valid statistical or other reasons for whatever I say about certain players.There's nothing wrong in saying Imran was a better bowler than Marshall as both were pretty close ut Imran was just better IMO because he played in more much more difficult conditions & did much more for his team than Marshall did.That was as a bowler but as an allrounder & overall cricketer:Wow, I did not know that your species existed. I thought it was completely unanimous that Marshall was by far the best quick ever to have lived.
*checks name*
Ah a Pak fan. Never mind.
With just Hobbs, Bradmen and Len Hutton you will need to have something amazing to get the out and the rest of teh team is of the quaitly and with teh bowling you might argue with muithmithan and warne but the Jim laker who is one of the best and in my opinion is the best spin bowler ever.Cannot believe there is a debate about this. Bradman + Hobbs + Marshall + Barnes = large victories. Especially on sticky wickets, the living XI would be like rabbits in a headlight playing on those.
Is this some kind of wind-up?With just Hobbs, Bradmen and Len Hutton you will need to have something amazing to get the out and the rest of teh team is of the quaitly and with teh bowling you might argue with muithmithan and warne but the Jim laker who is one of the best and in my opinion is the best spin bowler ever.
Its not unanimous by any means though, don't know where you got that idea. Although Imran is not a particularly popular candidate for best seamer of all time, one must admit.Wow, I did not know that your species existed. I thought it was completely unanimous that Marshall was by far the best quick ever to have lived.
*checks name*
Ah a Pak fan. Never mind.
Marshall played well in all conditions though, including in the subcontinent. Not sure how you can hold it against him for not playing so many games there.Yes a Pak fan but you shouldn't jump to making opinions about persons that quickly.I might be a great fan of Imran but I'm also the person who criticizes Pakistan team & bash the players the most.Spend more time here & you'd come to know that I have fairly valid statistical or other reasons for whatever I say about certain players.There's nothing wrong in saying Imran was a better bowler than Marshall as both were pretty close ut Imran was just better IMO because he played in more much more difficult conditions & did much more for his team than Marshall did.That was as a bowler but as an allrounder & overall cricketer:
Imran>>>Marshall
You bigots really are a painful lot.Wow, I did not know that your species existed. I thought it was completely unanimous that Marshall was by far the best quick ever to have lived.
*checks name*
Ah a Pak fan. Never mind.
Bradman may not be able to hit those amazing pulls of not so short deliveries but Hayden would have trouble staying upright on stickesBradman can't handle the sticky wickets. So I'd rather have Hayden on those.