Nah I think he genuinley thought it had missed the stumps. If not, he's a damn fine actor.Nah I thought he was expressing something like 'wow I can't believe I finally got him', lost for words kind of thing.
Anyways Australia bookies favourites now.
Ya seemed a bit emotional.Nah I thought he was expressing something like 'wow I can't believe I finally got him', lost for words kind of thing.
Dunno, he has dismissed Tendulkar six times before in ODIs, not sure why it would be a big deal.Nah I thought he was expressing something like 'wow I can't believe I finally got him', lost for words kind of thing.
Anyways Australia bookies favourites now.
Some things don't necessarily have a diminishing marginal utility.Dunno, he has dismissed Tendulkar six times before in ODIs, not sure why it would be a big deal.
It's hardly getting Bradman out for a duck though.Some things don't necessarily have a diminishing marginal utility.
Gets a bit of seam at times but he's not normally a swinger of the ball, no. Apparently he swung the ball in first class cricket on those few occassions he took the new ball for Queensland but other than that I'd never heard of him swinging it.Does Hopes swing the ball normally?
Haha, good man.I take back my little interest in this match comments now.
Some one can get emotional at getting a batsman like Lara, Tendulkar or Dravid out too.It's hardly getting Bradman out for a duck though.
Dead set best use of economic theory in a cricket context.Some things don't necessarily have a diminishing marginal utility.
Comparative advantage is sometimes useful when you're talking about selection of players in different roles but yes, that was quality.Dead set best use of economic theory in a cricket context.
Agreed. Wonderful knock.Hope everyone realises how class Ponting's fifty was on this track.
Missed itHope everyone realises how class Ponting's fifty was on this track.