Pup Clarke
Cricketer Of The Year
The ran at him and touched him, after that Dida was completely in the wrong. I don't see how Dida can get away with this, Celtic will obviously get punished as well.
all he has to say is "i suddenly felt in a state of shock, i simply couldnt stay on my feet and nearly passed out", where it may seem like a blatant lie, and probably would be, there is no way anyone can conclusively prove that he was trying to bring the game into disrepute.Sledger's right, there's no way that anything will actually be done about it. But to Sledger, how is it impossible to prove that his intentions were dishonourable? I can't actually see any way in which is actions could be interpreted as honourable.
mate think outside the box, Dida may well have been in the wrong, but one stupid act brought on another, Dida was stupid and Childish, but he didnt break any rules, what you have said there is a lesser equivalent of "the fan put a gun in his face, so hit punched him in the face, after he hit him he was completely in the wrong".The ran at him and touched him, after that Dida was completely in the wrong. I don't see how Dida can get away with this, Celtic will obviously get punished as well.
Whether thats the case or not, what you have just said is completely meaningless as it cannot be proved on way or the other.Of course he wants the game replayed, he's just let in a howler, his team's lost 2-1 in the dying seconds, seems to me as thought that woulod quite clearly be his intentions.
=sledger;1343006] but he didnt break any rules,So what's cheating?
=sledger;1343006] but he didnt break any rules,find me the rule where it is stated that you simulation in response to small clash with a fan is prohibited.So what's cheating?
Of course it can't be literally proved, but c'mon he's commited a howler and he's team's lost in the dying seconds.what you have just said is completely meaningless as it cannot be proved on way or the other.
Find me a rule which states that you can start faking/simulating injury when comfronted by a fan?find me the rule where it is stated that you simulation in response to small clash with a fan is prohibited.
They're completely separate issues. Whether Dida had done that in response to an opposition player or a fan, the crime is the same. The fan was wrong, and Dida was wrong, but the keeper's crimes aren't made in better or worse because his antagonist was a spectatorFind me a rule which states that you can start faking/simulating injury when comfronted by a fan?
that argument simply doesnt stand up i'm afraid, its like saying "find me a law that states i can wiggle my fingers", you cant base an argument on the principle that you need to have a rule to entitle you to do anything.Find me a rule which states that you can start faking/simulating injury when comfronted by a fan?
Dida's actions are covered by FIFA law 12, decision 5. Linky:that argument simply doesnt stand up i'm afraid, its like saying "find me a law that states i can wiggle my fingers", you cant base an argument on the principle that you need to have a rule to entitle you to do anything.
hmm fair enough, but i would argue that his behaviour wasnt a direct attempt to con the referee, more of an attempt to draw attention to himself, to suggest all that was on his mind was an attempt to get the match replayed is a bit far fetched, probably just saw that he had no chance of catching the fan so he thought he would make a fuss out of it.Dida's actions are covered by FIFA law 12, decision 5. Linky:
Any simulating action anywhere on the field, which is intended to deceive the referee, must be sanctioned as unsporting behaviour.
No mention of there being a requirement for a player to have been fouled by a member of the opposition.
As the referee is the ultimate arbiter on the field of play (not afterwards tho, obviously) any simulation is usually treated as an attempt to hoodwink him (or her, but hopefully him ).hmm fair enough, but i would argue that his behaviour wasnt a direct attempt to con the referee, more of an attempt to draw attention to himself, to suggest all that was on his mind was an attempt to get the match replayed is a bit far fetched, probably just saw that he had no chance of catching the fan so he thought he would make a fuss out of it.
hmm i remember that incident, however on that occasion the keeper entirely fabricated the entire incident, he wasnt touched by the firecracker or whatever it was at all. Contact (no matter how minimal) was made with Dida, that difference will probably be enough to stave off any unlikely possibility of punishment.As the referee is the ultimate arbiter on the field of play (not afterwards tho, obviously) any simulation is usually treated as an attempt to hoodwink him (or her, but hopefully him ).
Years ago Chile were actually thrown out of the 1994 world cup after their keeper pretended to be badly hurt by firecrackers thrown by the opposition fans, so perhaps Milan are keeping quiet because of this precedent. (Link.)
Ah, that's probably true. I was arguing that he should have been punished tho & that there's a law to support that decision.I am afraid that I concur with Sledge again, years of experience with UEFA/FIFA should tell you that nothing will happen to Dida whatsoever.