Corli
U19 Cricketer
AWTA. And I have to cheer for him.He is absolutely dire. There are at least ten batsmen I can think of I'd pick ahead of him.
AWTA. And I have to cheer for him.He is absolutely dire. There are at least ten batsmen I can think of I'd pick ahead of him.
Also Duminy who I just remembered.Kallis
Smith
Prince
Gibbs
Rudolph
De Villiers
Dippenaar
McKenzie
Kemp
Van Wyk
I'm aware Rudolph is not available, but if they'd selected him ahead of Amla in the first place, he wouldn't have run off to England.
I'd even consider selecting Pollock as a specialist batsman ahead of him!
Nah, I'd take Amla before Bosman. Just.Bosman is a dire test option but he is a better option then Amla also.
I thought you were meaning in place of Amla, in which case the top four and de Villiers wouldn't count. Rudolph shouldn't count either, he is no longer available for South Africa.Kallis
Smith
Prince
Gibbs
Rudolph
De Villiers
Dippenaar
McKenzie
Kemp
Van Wyk
I'm aware Rudolph is not available, but if they'd selected him ahead of Amla in the first place, he wouldn't have run off to England.
I'd even consider selecting Pollock as a specialist batsman ahead of him!
No way. That's just ridiculous.Bosman is a dire test option but he is a better option then Amla also.
You think Bosman couldn't average atleast 26?No way. That's just ridiculous.
I didn't though. I meant what I said - that there'd be 10 batsman I'd take ahead of him.I thought you were meaning in place of Amla
But he would be if they hadn't picked Amla in the first place. Replace him with Duminy if you must.Rudolph shouldn't count either, he is no longer available for South Africa.
He'd average around 20 IMO.You think Bosman couldn't average atleast 26?
Early days for Amla yet, not saying he's going to be a world-beater, or even a decent batsman, but an average of 26 doesn't do him just. Also, no I don't think Bosman would get near that mark. He only just averages over that in First Class cricket, let alone Test cricket. Amla atleast has performed in domestic cricket, and put runs on the board. Bosman is a slogger and one of the worst specialist batsman in South Africa.You think Bosman couldn't average atleast 26?
Fair enough, but there are batsman who aren't competing for Amla's slot in the side, which is what you were getting at IMO. Anyway, doesn't matter too much. I reckon Amla has some potential, but I don't think he should be a regular fixture. Neil McKenzie would be a much better option, as would either of the van Jaarsvald brothers.I didn't though. I meant what I said - that there'd be 10 batsman I'd take ahead of him.
But he would be if they hadn't picked Amla in the first place. Replace him with Duminy if you must.
But there are those that are. Dippenaar, Kemp, McKenzie, Van Wyk and Duminy were listed.Fair enough, but there are batsman who aren't competing for Amla's slot in the side
Tis four. Personally I can't see Kemp being much of a sucess as Test level, nor Dippenaar. However, you obviously really don't like Amla, so I can see where you are coming from.But there are those that are. Dippenaar, Kemp, McKenzie, Van Wyk and Duminy were listed.
Which is four more than zero.Tis four.