dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Hobbs.
OK.I think cricket has got to the stage where you can't compare anyone earlier than about the 1940's even realistically to someone who plays now. (A) virtually noone actually has seen the older player and the conditions are universes apart.
Well saidJack Hobbs. Ahead of WG Grace purely due to his achievements in Test cricket (which is circumstantial rather than any reflection on Grace.)
Anyone that thinks Nasser Hussain is better than Hayden needs to stay out of the conversation altogether.Oh, and anyone who thinks Hayden would be among the best openers in The World any time other than post-2001 or possibly (but only possibly) the 1930s needs 2nd lesson to be devoted to "cricket".
They don't, especially considering some of the very fine openers that have been left off the list.Dont see how Langer Sewag and Anwar belong on that list tbh.
Barry?For me, Hobbs, Sutcliffe and Hutton.
One of the few lists England can really contribute to.
However, Richards was 3 times the player that most of those guys were and he doesnt make the list even if there is a 10 Test min
Nah. It'd take extreme modern-day bias to say otherwise to either.Anyone that thinks Nasser Hussain is better than Hayden needs to stay out of the conversation altogether.
Sehwag and Langer, yeah; Anwar... well he's not in Morris or Sutcliffe's league, undoubtedly, but he was a very fine opener, of that there's no doubt.Saeed Anwar, Justin Langer and Virender Sehwag don't deserve to be mentioned, they aren't even close. To put them on the list and leave out names like Arthur Morris, Herbert Sutcliffe and WG Grace was very foolish.
Obviously.Barry?
Anwar was a very good opener, but not as good as some of the names that have been excluded, hence why he doesn't deserve to be on the list. Do you not class Langer amongst those other batsman as some of the best openers of recent times?Sehwag and Langer, yeah; Anwar... well he's not in Morris or Sutcliffe's league, undoubtedly, but he was a very fine opener, of that there's no doubt.
Certainly up there with the Athertons, Kirstens, Taylors and Slaters among the best openers of more recent times.
If you dont include Hobbs in your options thats not that silly for mine.
He is better than both, and still has a way to go. And let's keep the Hayden bashing to a minimum. Let's just speak for ourselves - i.e. your humanity.To suggest Hayden is as good as the Athertons and Slaters is bad enough for me; to suggest he's on a plane with the Boycotts and Gavaskars is awful; to put him even remotely close to the Huttons, Sutcliffes, Hobbses et al is borderline an insult to humanity.