Why? 'Cos I don't like boxing?No doubt, otherwise I'd question why you watch sport, which would be silly. I still feel sorry for you, particular in the case you mentioned of Frazer-Ali.
Because you don't appear to appreciate some of the things that makes sport truly great and a pleasure to watch. Even if you don't enjoy the actual sport being played, you should be able to appreciate the spectacle, entertainment, conest, passion, context and situation surrounding that particular sport.Why? 'Cos I don't like boxing?
Maybe somewhat, but more to do with both comps being dire imo.Anything to do with England being crap?
EDIT: And Scotland being eliminated after the first round.
Yeah, makes sense, but it's not the way I am. I'd enjoy Exeter Sunday XI vs Woodland Fort Sunday XI more than anything (and I mean ANYTHING) in motorsport, boxing or anything else, simply because I like cricket and I don't like motorsport or boxing. The calibre of play, the passion involved from large numbers... it just doesn't matter to me if I don't enjoy the format.Because you don't appear to appreciate some of the things that makes sport truly great and a pleasure to watch. Even if you don't enjoy the actual sport being played, you should be able to appreciate the spectacle, entertainment, conest, passion, context and situation surrounding that particular sport.
Bathurst is an example. I'm not much of a motorsport fan, but I watch Bathurst every year because of what it is, but not because of what it actually is. Make sense?
I know what you mean about the 'text book quality' however, the fundamentals of Twenty20, ODI and test cricket are the same. You will succeed if you do the basics right, relative to the context, in all forms of the game.I understand the argument that there isn't much text book quality cricket but I still think the world cup in the caribbean was dire so I'm going for the twenty twenty.
Pretty strong words by your standards?The idiocy of voting for WC2007 when not having even watched 20Twenty is beyond me.
And such ways are something I just don't enjoy personally. I don't really like seeing six-sixes overs, and it's a bit farcical that it's happened in 2 major "international" tournaments within 6 months, having only happened twice previously in the recognised top-level history of the game.
The six-sixes overs, though, are just one example. Twenty20 differs from ODIs to an impossibly greater extent than ODIs differ from Tests.
I don't mind someone preferring the ODI World Cup, that's opinion. Voting for the ODI World Cup when you didn't even watch the Twenty20 is just plain idiocy.Pretty strong words by your standards?
"Standard" ER in Tests - 3-an-over; "standard" ER in ODIs - 4-an-over.Although I dont really see that 2020 differs from ODI more than ODIs differ from tests
I didn't especially think it was, but I still think that's a touch harsh. I can't ever remember seeing you describe something so strongly TBH, which is why I was taken aback.I don't mind someone preferring the ODI World Cup, that's opinion. Voting for the ODI World Cup when you didn't even watch the Twenty20 is just plain idiocy.
Post wasn't directed at you at all btw.
Fair dos, it's just that judging things when you haven't listened to/seen them or whatever is one of the things that I detest.I didn't especially think it was, but I still think that's a touch harsh. I can't ever remember seeing you describe something so strongly TBH, which is why I was taken aback.