I think we already know that there are 50 (or more) people who'll think it's fine, though, otherwise there'd have been outcry already. There's no valid reason for thinking such, though, other than "I don't mind it".But then that's not a true representation of people's opinions on whether or not it should be taken down. If you have ten people reply agreeing with you, then that could be reason to take it down. But if there are 50 people who think it should stay and have perfectly valid reasons for that, then that should be taken into account, and we wouldn't get to hear that side of the story if only those who agree with you posted.
Watch some Simpsons ffs.'Bout the closest to an Inzy I've ever seen from Dasa TBH.
Can't say I'm surprised at that. You often consider the day wasted if you haven't accused someone of making a fuss about nothing.
I feel like quoting these but I can't think what to say, just so strange and bemusing.I can't say there is any example which comes immediately to mind, no. I won't retract the opinion, though, no, nor will I say it was a remotely spur-of-the-moment thought, because it wasn't.
You strike me as being one of the most "yeah, whatever" posters on this entire place, frankly. This in itself is a "criticism" of which far worse things have been hurled at people. What I said about "dumbing down" in the 2nd post is exactly the same thing I said in the 1st - dumbing things down, ie, saying someone is making a fuss that need not be made.
It is very rare for me to even think of belittling anyone on CW, however. Very rare indeed. As I said - I've thought far worse things about people than that they are laissez-faire. There are plenty of people on CW (who I respect far more than yourself) who I'd say something fairly similar about, in fact.
Perhaps because you have nothing to add?I feel like quoting these but I can't think what to say
He doesn't need to say anything. By just quoting those posts he did an excellent job of summing up the situation.Perhaps because you have nothing to add?