Unattainableguy
State 12th Man
Vote.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Best Bowling Attack
- Thread starter Unattainableguy
- Start date
Unattainableguy
State 12th Man
Read the title: it says best bowling attack, not good bowling attacks, so you can eliminate Eng, NZ, Ind. And Bang and WI
gunner
U19 Cricketer
has to be between pakistan,Sa and the aussies.
i would rank pakistan number 1 aussies number 2 and then saffies.
with teh finding of tanvir pakistan have an even more better squad of fast bowlers than last year.
like ian chappell said 2 days ago.
pakistan just shake the tree and down comes a fast bowler whenever they need 1
i would rank pakistan number 1 aussies number 2 and then saffies.
with teh finding of tanvir pakistan have an even more better squad of fast bowlers than last year.
like ian chappell said 2 days ago.
pakistan just shake the tree and down comes a fast bowler whenever they need 1
Perm
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Well if you listed those other nations then we would have a broader selection to chose the best bowling attack from, wouldn't we?Read the title: it says best bowling attack, not good bowling attacks, so you can eliminate Eng, NZ, Ind. And Bang and WI
Unattainableguy
State 12th Man
No, because NZ only have only 1 great bowler while India and England have none. So if anyone would vote for either of these teams as having the best bowling attack, it would entirely be because of bias.
Perm
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
A star team will always beat a team of stars. New Zealand have one great bowler, but they'e got a couple of pretty good support bowlers like Franklin and Vettori. As a unit, England are right up there when they field Flintoff, Panesar, Hoggard and another bowler while India are the same. Harbhajan, Kumble, Khan and Munaf is a very, very good bowling attack, despite not having any "great" bowlers, which is obviously in your opinion, as Kumble is a great bowler IMO.
Turbinator
Cricketer Of The Year
Haha Canada FTW! 
Flem274*
123/5
I followed your example and filtered the stats.
Flem274*
123/5
Nah I just made it all upYou gave special precedence to the first 7 threads, reasoning that they were early on, didn't you?!
Perm
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
I was so, so tempted to go and find (and link to) all the threads along these lines now, but if so it'll have to wait - bed calls.Nah I just made it all up
Turbinator
Cricketer Of The Year
Haha I love it! You're a genius. First that rant in the 20/20 WC forum, and now this.Nah I just made it all up
Matt79
Hall of Fame Member
Voted Australia.
Pakistan are the other contender, with Asif as a quality leader of the attack. But I'd say Clark is just as good at the moment, and Lee, Johnson/Tait and MacGill are better than the Pakistani equivalents. I'm assuming Akhtar is injured/suspended/an idiot wasting his talent here folks.
For SA Pollock-Ntini = Clark-Lee IMO, but MacGill makes the Aussie attack better balanced.
Pakistan are the other contender, with Asif as a quality leader of the attack. But I'd say Clark is just as good at the moment, and Lee, Johnson/Tait and MacGill are better than the Pakistani equivalents. I'm assuming Akhtar is injured/suspended/an idiot wasting his talent here folks.
For SA Pollock-Ntini = Clark-Lee IMO, but MacGill makes the Aussie attack better balanced.