• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in England

Prince EWS

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Jono said:
Can I ask, why you pidgeonhole styles of cricket? Why not like a variety of styles. I can appreciate a good Kallis knock just as much as an Afridi, or in this case Wright going nuts.

Not a criticism, just curious.
Click to expand...
It's just what I like to see, really. I can appreciate Wright's innings here as being very important for his team and exactly what was required - it was a very good innings. It just wasn't as asthetically pleasing to me as Kallis or Watson would have been though. Nothing against the innings from a cricketing sense, but he's not going to leap up my list of favourite players unless he plays the style of cricket I enjoy. That doesn't mean I won't be able to recognise his performances if he plays well, though, unless he's Andrew Symonds.
 
pup11

pup11

International Coach
Zak (Zaheer) has bowled really well and he has been the best bowler on show throughout this series.
 
Jono

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Honestly, Ajit Agarkar is so useless its not even funny anymore, its just annoying.
Prince EWS said:
It's just what I like to see, really. I can appreciate Wright's innings here as being very important for his team and exactly what was required - it was a very good innings. It just wasn't as asthetically pleasing to me as Kallis or Watson would have been though. Nothing against the innings from a cricketing sense, but he's not going to leap up my list of favourite players unless he plays the style of cricket I enjoy. That doesn't mean I won't be able to recognise his performances if he plays well, though, unless he's Andrew Symonds.
Click to expand...
Nah I understand that, just curious as to why you like only one style. Fair enough though.
 
Jono

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
SJS said:
It always has been throughout his ridiculous career.
Click to expand...
India have had a big ears requirement it seems, with one player at least having huge hears.

Surely Gambhir can fill that void, and we can let AA's career finally end?
 
pup11

pup11

International Coach
Agarkar is just not a death bowler and the sooner Dravid realizes this the better it would be for India, but on second thoughts does India have anyone better than Agarkar atm i guess the answer is NO.
 
Prince EWS

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
pup11 said:
Agarkar is just not a death bowler and the sooner Dravid realizes this the better it would be for India, but on second thoughts does India have anyone better than Agarkar atm i guess the answer is NO.
Click to expand...
Agarkar actually is a death bowler, he's just bowled complete rubbish all series.
 
Athlai

Athlai

Not Terrible
pup11 said:
Agarkar is just not a death bowler and the sooner Dravid realizes this the better it would be for India, but on second thoughts does India have anyone better than Agarkar atm i guess the answer is NO.
Click to expand...
I'd rather Sreesanth attitude or not, and RPS... and probably Patel too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top