Quoted for posterity!I don't usually have the time to volunteer for much on here, but I'd be more than happy to correllate everyone's lists and calculate the points to present the final 50 (or 25) if and when this goes ahead.
I'd love to do it! If for no other reason than I get to hog the glory and present the countdown...Quoted for posterity!
That'll be one hell of a job if this goes through. Almost worthy of an honourary poster-title.
You wonder why the same did not apply for Inzi thou.He has a point. Australia were the best team in the world when Donald was playing and for one reason or another, he couldn't replicate his sucess against other nations for Australia.
Just for you Richard.. i wouldn't be calling him Sala..... its not nice to call people salaSala = Pakistani.
It's as unavoidable as Warne being an Aussie. Sala doesn't just remember Inzy for his (relative - I think like Donald's against Australia Inzy's is overstated) failures against Aus, but rather for his brilliance on any number of occasions.
Similarly, I, almost certainly AAD's 2nd biggest fan on this board, am unlikely to put him below many if any.
I knew that Malcolm Marshall was a bit special - doesn't get a CAPS while everyone else does.Ok here is my final fifty
In the order of openers, Other batsmen, all rounders, keepers, spinners, pacers
Australia
- Simpson
- Lawry
- Hayden
- Greg Chappell
- Doug Walters
- SteveWaugh
- Alan Border
- Healy
- Gilchrist
- Warne
- Lillee
- McGrath
Windies
- Hunte
- Greenidge
- Richards
- Kanhai
- Lara
- Lloyd
- Sobers
- Hall
- Roberts
- Holding
- Garner
- Ambrose
- marshall
ENGLAND
- Boycott
- Dexter
- Cowdrey
- Barrington
- Botham
- Knott
- Bob Taylor
- John Snow
INDIA
- Gavaskar
- Tendulkar
- Dravid
- Vishwanath
- Kapil Dev
- Prasanna
- Bedi
PAKISTAN
- Haneef
- Zaheer
- Miandaad
- Imran
- Waqar
- Wasim
SRI LANKA
- Arvinda D'Silva
- Murali
NEW ZEALAND
- Sutcliffe
- Hadlee
SOUTH AFRICA ZIMBABWE
- Andy Flower
- Donald
I added Zimbabwe and South Africa afterwards making it 52. Maybe I will bracket Flower with Gilchrist as a batsman keeper and bracket Garner and Ambrose together
Ok here is my final fifty
Is there a specific reason for post-1930 as opposed to post-WWI?TBH I'd be happiest to say post-1930 myself, for several reasons I can go into if desired.
Agree with that mate, but was actually asking why not post-WWI rather post-WWII, as to me there wasn't a lot of difference between cricket in the 1920s and cricket in the 1930s. There was, however, a pretty substantial difference between pre-WWI and post-WWI.1930 was when many things started - pitches which we'd recognise today; newsreel coverage with sound which enabled us to properly assess players.
Not much changed between 1939 and 1945, really, apart from the tragic loss of several players. At least, as far as I'm aware.
1930 seems a pivotal cricketing point, rather than a pivotal socialogical point, to draw the line.