Sorry for being misleading. I'm talking about Flintoff in general, not in respect to who replaces him.Not sure what your saying here, that in a run chase it wouldn't make a difference if Lewis was there or Flintoff? I beg to differ, Lewis being a direct replacment for Flintoff is certainly not going to help England's chances, regardless of Flintoff's current dire form. And I agree Bopara is a much greater loss in the batting dept. and I never said otherwise.
He opted out, tbf.Looking a pretty stupid decision to 'rest' or whatever it was, meaning Dravid isn't in the Twenty20 World Championships.
Yea, pretty stupid decision from Dravid then.He opted out, tbf.
So what, bat him at 9/10 in your opinion?Sorry for being misleading. I'm talking about Flintoff in general, not in respect to who replaces him.
I think selectors, coaches, (most) fan and other stakeholders would be kidding themsleves thinking that Flintoff would be an asset in a big run chase.
Re-reading your post, I think it has come a time where Lewis is as good as Flintoff in a run chase (this maybe a hyperbole, but Flintoff's form is terrible).
Bat him under Shah and Bopara to start with.So what? Bat him at 9/10?
Not a fan, I take it?Given how ordinary Lewis has been with the ball & that Mascarenhas was in our original squad it seems a bizarre decision to play the curly-haired, large-nosed, slow-medium pie distributor.
Yeah, that was the real crime, as some of us said at the time. It also meant that Broad had a very different role in this game, and we've just seen how good an idea that was.It meant the Anderson/Broad opening combo was broken too, which had been working pretty well thus far.
I can see why he was picked, actually. If they had gone for Mascarenhas, we were down to two bowlers who you'd expect to be taking wickets in this form of the game, and one of those (Broad) is very inexperienced. The problem was how they allocated their overs, imo.Easy to be wise after the event, but it should've been a no-brainer anyway.
Lot more needed from India from here to win series. Not easy though! But for me, Its impossibleGood total for India... Series win here we come !
For India to win the series? Not at all, imo, if England are now without Bopara's batting & Flintoff's bowling. Your main four batters are all in good touch, and England haven't shown any inclination to score quickly against your two spinners.Lot more needed from India from here to win series. Not easy though! But for me, Its impossible
Whatever gave it away?Not a fan, I take it?
Yeah, I can see the thinking that went on with Lewis's selection, even if it was just based on the old Headingley=swing idea, but as I said he has to open & that's disrupted a bowling plan that had been working half-decently (certainly by our low standards, anyway) & has also weakened the batting line-up. Didn't think Dimi had done too badly in the middle overs either, but I would agree he's not a genuine wicket-taking option at this level.I can see why he was picked, actually. If they had gone for Mascarenhas, we were down to two bowlers who you'd expect to be taking wickets in this form of the game, and one of those (Broad) is very inexperienced. The problem was how they allocated their overs, imo.
Just returning the favour.Another convincing start by Prior
Hasn't tendulkar dropped one or two previously in this series?