Thanks mateA well-written piece from Mr Ehlers IMO. Agree with pretty much all of it (though opinion expressed is minimal of course, suggestion of possibility is aplenty).
Good to see something touching on technology in areas other than that relating to Umpiring too.
You use it every time you post your email addy.Thanks mate
I think that is the first time anyone has used my last name on this forum
Yes good point, still I think it would be the best solutionWith regards to rotation of umpires it depends how you do it. I think it is important that there's a fair balance for the two teams, as in you don't get one team having one 3rd umpire and the other getting someone different, it should be the same (roughly) for both sides. That is until any subjectivity is removed from the 3rd umpiring process, which is some way off as some people will see doubt in decisions whereas others will not.
The Test match is basically untouched since Cricket began
I must ask.How are things in cloud cukoo land?
Really, reducing lbw risk isn't the only reason batsmen play on the front-foot, is it?Batsman will no longer feel the need to go forward to many deliveries as it will not reduce the risk of being given out LBW.
You say batsmen walking becoming commonplace like it's a bad thing! If every batsman knows he's got no chance of getting away with a nick or glove, he won't try to, and for me nothing better could happen.With every edge being given, batsman will start walking too, negating the need for umpires. Each decision will take time and the already slow game will be slower.
Good point, walking can only be good for cricketReally, reducing lbw risk isn't the only reason batsmen play on the front-foot, is it?
You say batsmen walking becoming commonplace like it's a bad thing! If every batsman knows he's got no chance of getting away with a nick or glove, he won't try to, and for me nothing better could happen.
Also, will increased walking not reduce the need for a time-wasting decision?
Is England Cukoo land Richard?I must ask.
Untouched as far as rule changes and stuff i mean, are you in high school yet?I must ask.
Nope, it's an imaginary place.Is England Cukoo land Richard?
I know, and that's patently false, the rules have been changed any number of times.Untouched as far as rule changes and stuff i mean
No, I left it 5 years ago.are you in high school yet?
If you read my original message Dick it sais BASICALLY untouched not TOTALLY untouched!Nope, it's an imaginary place.
I know, and that's patently false, the rules have been changed any number of times.
No, I left it 5 years ago.
And I disagree that they're basically untouched.If you read my original message Dick it sais BASICALLY untouched not TOTALLY untouched!
Which has what to do with anything?Anyway my Aussies rule, and you know it
Who can beat them??
Well Dick if you would like to name every rule change since Cricket began in Sussex, England in 1697, Go right ahead you literal twit.And I disagree that they're basically untouched.
Which has what to do with anything?