Turbinator
Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah yoh seriously. Go Raghav!Keep going Raghav, you're a big help to India's chances.
Yeah yoh seriously. Go Raghav!Keep going Raghav, you're a big help to India's chances.
5 more to go. lets seeYeah yoh seriously. Go Raghav!
The question was "Who won?", and you responded "England's tailenders at the end" India won the game, so get over it and stop being such a pain.I didnt tell England tailenders won the match. They won many spectators' hearts for fighting till the end. Well done Broad and Mascarenhas
a win is a win, doesn't matter whether they win by 1 run or 1 wicket...and if they win the series with a series of close wins, that would be fine as well...but in order to win the series, they have to up their fielding and bowling significantly, batting alone won't always bail them out...It does matter mate...England will go into record books for being team that went so close to the target which is >300, while India will go in to the record books for being a team that lost by a margin of > 100 runs. Still, its 1-1. So, a lot of things mattered even its leveled.
I responded to 'Who won the hearts?' and not to Who won the match?The question was "Who won?", and you responded "England's tailenders at the end" India won the game, so get over it and stop being such a pain.
I agree win is win but, had England was allout for 100(ofcourse that doesnt happen) chasing 330, would you dont remember and say it was fantastic win..a win is a win, doesn't matter whether they win by 1 run or 1 wicket...and if they win the series with a series of close wins, that would be fine as well...but in order to win the series, they have to up their fielding and bowling significantly, batting alone won't always bail them out...
I responded to 'Who won the hearts?' and not to Who won the match?
The question is improper
Very well said.Dravid & SRT are certifiably gun. It must be said however, that Agakar most certaintly isn't.
LOL .Predicted response:
hahaha..I responded to 'Who won the hearts?' and not to Who won the match?
The question is improper