If it was a one off occasion sure, but 3rd? 4th time in the series? It's getting way too old.Meh **** happens get over it.
Certainly not such a terrible decision but it's not the first time he's been robbed of a ton on this tour. You can tell how badly he wants it, it hurts.Meh **** happens get over it.
So? It's part of cricket and that is what makes it such a great game. People seem to think there is some sort of agenda against him, which is rubbish imo. sure he has been unlucky, but he is no more likely to get a shocker than anyone else. Move on.Certainly not such a terrible decision but it's not the first time he's been robbed of a ton on this tour. You can tell how badly he wants it, it hurts.
No they don't. Stop making an issue where there is none. People are disappointed at the decision, that's all.So? It's part of cricket and that is what makes it such a great game. People seem to think there is some sort of agenda against him, which is rubbish imo. sure he has been unlucky, but he is no more likely to get a shocker than anyone else. Move on.
Who here said that?People seem to think there is some sort of agenda against him, which is rubbish imo.
You are right mate!So? It's part of cricket and that is what makes it such a great game. People seem to think there is some sort of agenda against him, which is rubbish imo. sure he has been unlucky, but he is no more likely to get a shocker than anyone else. Move on.
Is it? Interesting! That means a fair decision atleast. can't completely rule out.."The replays don't confirm or deny that. "
?"The replays don't confirm or deny that. "
True, but if he'd been on 59 rather than 99, it wouldn't have seemed half as bad. There seems to be a general feeling that this will be his last tour here, and I'm sure a lot of England fans as well as Indians wanted to see him get three figures.So? It's part of cricket and that is what makes it such a great game. People seem to think there is some sort of agenda against him, which is rubbish imo. sure he has been unlucky, but he is no more likely to get a shocker than anyone else. Move on.
No they don't. Stop making an issue where there is none. People are disappointed at the decision, that's all.
Sorry if it sounded like I was implying members here were saying there was an agenda against him, because that isn't the case. I've heard from a few non-cweb people that they think people are biased against him etc.Who here said that?