This is not up for discussion here. If you want to talk to us further, email moderators@cricketweb.net.I am not!
look the past posts and decide who is baiting
Did I discuss further?This is not up for discussion here. If you want to talk to us further, email moderators@cricketweb.net.
It was obviously for his superior fieldingDavid Glick: "What a great decision to replace Monty with Tremlett. I bet he's laughing..."
I'm sorry, I am following on cricinfo. So was that sarcasm or just a great coincidence?It was obviously for his superior fielding
Sarcasm, he was chosen because the pitch was initially thought to be fast, it is actually quite slow.I'm sorry, I am following on cricinfo. So was that sarcasm or just a great coincidence?
SarcasmI'm sorry, I am following on cricinfo. So was that sarcasm or just a great coincidence?
I asked because just after I read the post, I read this:Sarcasm, he was chosen because the pitch was initially thought to be fast, it is actually quite slow.
Did I discuss further?
You are again bringing it up?
..........I am not!
look the past posts and decide who is baiting
It was excellent try from TremlettI asked because just after I read the post, I read this:
Flintoff to Tendulkar, 1 run, Dropped by Tremlett at mid off. Tendulkar drives uppishly to mid off where Tremlett, 6''7', jumps, gets his palm to the ball but can't hold one.
edit: Okay..
..........
.............................................................................................................
****
He has a really dire record at this ground apparently. Itstl.Oh dear, Dimi getting smashed, always feared this on a flat wicket
But Monty would have caught it.It was excellent try from Tremlett
Tendulkar and Yuvraj hope you are right.I think collingwood will soon come to bowl