David
International 12th Man
Yes, but your comments are meant to be impartial, surely?I'm still entitled to my opinion aren't I?
I don't think you should be posting stuff like that, but that's my opinion.
Yes, but your comments are meant to be impartial, surely?I'm still entitled to my opinion aren't I?
How can an opinion be impartial? It must be in favour of one over another, and in this case I agree with Sanz. Also, I wasn't laughing at Richard, but his comment "It get's rather tiresome TBH" when the exact same thing could be said of his continual use of peoples real names.Yes, but your comments are meant to be impartial, surely?
I don't think you should be posting stuff like that, but that's my opinion.
I was more trying to say, I think you should keep your opinion to yourself.How can an opinion be impartial? It must be in favour of one over another, and in this case I agree with Sanz. Also, I wasn't laughing at Richard, but his comment "It get's rather tiresome TBH" when the exact same thing could be said of his continual use of peoples real names.
Because I'm a Staff Member? Because if that's the case then I must say I am quite disappointed that some members don't think it's good if I do voice my opinion because of my position.I was more trying to say, I think you should keep your opinion to yourself.
Cool bananas. Just think it'd be good for you to set a good example.Because I'm a Staff Member? Because if that's the case then I must say I am quite disappointed that some members don't think it's good if I do voice my opinion because of my position.
So is Richard.That's perpetuating this rubbish, and you a staff member!![]()
Awta.Freaking hell, left CC for a reason, that being the constant arguments and what not, but now they have started elsewhere, this is ridiculous give them both 7 imo, sick of this rubbish.
PermSo is Richard.
I also have absolutely no idea who Ritchie is.
Of course you are. I just thought that, in the context of what had gone before in this thread, your post was unnecessary and a bit inflammable. Some agree with Richard, if they say that, before you know it, the whole merry-go-round is going around again. So it could have started more bad stuff.I'm still entitled to my opinion aren't I?
Yep.Freaking hell, left CC for a reason, that being the constant arguments and what not, but now they have started elsewhere, this is ridiculous give them both 7 imo, sick of this rubbish.
I accept that perhaps at the start of proceedings I was a bit unneccessarily heavy-handed, but this is only because of stuff left hanging over from last time.
After "round one", once more, I am IMO in the right otherwise I would not have kept going.
Thread closed.Forum Rules said:No flame wars - This is basically when two people are in an argument on the forums and resort to personal attacks on each other. No tolerance will be given for this sort of thing. Just keep in mind that you are arguing via text on a public message board... Is there really a clean cut winner? I suggest you keep that sort of thing on someone else's board or some instant messaging service.