You can ask pasag why he noticed this time and not that time. Your tendency to address posters by their real names has been offensive to some in the past and these awards are for all of CW, not just the old-timers who know everyone by name. Just to avoid controversy and confusion, can you stick to forum names? Don't really have an issue with it myself but I can see why others might. The weekly awards thread has been the center of heated debate for the wrong reasons very often lately - let's make sure that doesn't happen again.Eh, I just don't get it - no-one said so much as a thing in this instance, why do I get singled-out? It wasn't actually even deliberate - as I've said many times, I struggle to even think of Gelman as "pasag" TBH, and whenever I read "pasag" it basically registers as "Zac Gelman" in my mind. That's why I typed what I typed in this thread pre-editing. I don't get why it wasn't even mentioned when Sean - I presume - made a similar slip-up.
As I said the first time this issue came-up relating to Awards, I take care to do so when posting Awards, however on this occasion one slipped through the net, for reasons I explained in my previous post. I really don't think one simple mistake deserves this crucifixion I've received so far.Just to avoid controversy and confusion, can you stick to forum names?
I realize that you made a mistake - not a big deal. You get my point.Richard said:Perhaps I've allowed the previous case's ridiculous overreactions from several parties to cloud the issue here. You, and Gelman TBH, seemed to be making more of it than should have been made. Crucify is perhaps a bit OTT on my part nonetheless. You were not to know, of course, that I was not once more being obstinate with this issue and had rather simply made a small error.
Well yes, I was amused more than anything else. Didn't take offense or condemn you.Richard said:I think you've been involved in discussions of this issue several times with me, most notably when you said "you don't really need to publicise my name that much do you?"
Please stop using my real name Richard. I don't want people to"you don't really need to publicise my name that much do you?"
As I said the first time this issue came-up relating to Awards, I take care to do so when posting Awards, however on this occasion one slipped through the net, for reasons I explained in my previous post. I really don't think one simple mistake deserves this crucifixion I've received so far.
Lol, I thought you made a mistake and I fixed it up. Overreaction surely? If you could point out how you have been unfairly treated from the seven words I've written on the matter, informing you of the edit, it'd be much appreciated.Perhaps I've allowed the previous case's ridiculous overreactions from several parties to cloud the issue here. You, and Gelman TBH, seemed to be making more of it than should have been made. Crucify is perhaps a bit OTT on my part nonetheless. You were not to know, of course, that I was not once more being obstinate with this issue and had rather simply made a small error.
I think you've been involved in discussions of this issue several times with me, most notably when you said "you don't really need to publicise my name that much do you?"
Cheers for the award, I've changed it to my username though.
Haha you know exactly why, don't try and avoid itBut what did I do to deserve such a label ?
Surely HDS knows his own name!no-one on CW does AFAIK
Eh, as I say, I've probably taken stuff from what was said last time and added it to this case (and you were, without in any way being harsh, one of my more vocal critics on said occasion). Meaning I've probably been over-defensive towards yourself and Akhil. Apologies.Lol, I thought you made a mistake and I fixed it up. Overreaction surely? If you could point out how you have been unfairly treated from the seven words I've written on the matter, informing you of the edit, it'd be much appreciated.
Says you should get more friendly with some of us.FWIW I'd prefer you used usernames Rich, purely because when you use real names a lot of the time I have no idea who you're talking about. I'm not friendly enough with other members outside this forum to know real names.
Which may or may not say more about me than anything else...
Its no secret... The user name says it all really.Surely HDS knows his own name!
On tour, my friend. Let me just draw your attention to one scorecard.How did you do all this travelling in your younger days if you were on a cricket field then?
Done.Fire me off a mail at the address Akhil (adharcric) mentioned, just to check compatibility, so to speak.
WoW... so... you... seriously... are... Heath... Davis...?On tour, my friend. Let me just draw your attention to one scorecard.
http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archive/Scorecards/79/79598.html
*nominates for next week's Adams*WoW... so... you... seriously... are... Heath... Davis...?
As a fine man (Liam Camps) once said: just... wow...
Well... nice to have you on CW I suppose, Heath.