archie mac
International Coach
Well Clem said Vic was better than him, in fact he said 'as a batsman I am not fit to lick Vics' boots'No Clem Hill, Archie?
So I went for Trumper, but if we mention left handers...
Well Clem said Vic was better than him, in fact he said 'as a batsman I am not fit to lick Vics' boots'No Clem Hill, Archie?
5. Niel Harvey
He's a little overrated I feel. Harvey's legacy was being the one great Aussie batsman for quite a while. Because of that he stands out as great, because his contributions meant so much. I don't think his talent reveals the same mettle displayed by Waugh and Border.
Only in test matches.1. Greg Chappell
2. Steve Waugh
3. Ricky Ponting
4. Allan Border
5.Michael Hussey-Australia has never lost wen they picked Hussey.
No, But 33 Centuries and 9000+ runs @ 60 is awesome, no matter who you played against and IMO he will end up as the second best Aussie batsman after Sir Don.
Which is it, man? Cause if that's the case then Border would quite easily be leaps and bounds ahead of Ponting.Sanz said:36 in 80s is better than 50s of today.
That is an incredible statistic1. Greg Chappell
Easy pick. The best batsman of the 70s.
2. Steve Waugh
If you blinked for a second around 1995 you might've missed a time when Steve Waugh was mentioned in the same sentence as Lara and Tendulkar. Is he as good as them? No. But the fact that, for a time, he was mentioned as the best batsman in the world (seriously!) when Lara and Tendulkar were in-form, says something about his talent. I have a werid reasoning for putting him ahead of Ponting. I think Waugh played tougher opposition better than Ponting, while Ponting played easier opposition better than Waugh. Ponting has more talent and more flair, but when it comes down to gritting out a tough innings when needed, Waugh could face just about anything. Waugh faced some of the best fast bowling ever, in the toughest conditions, and nutted out some excellent innings.
3. Ricky Ponting
I think it's OK to have him this high. Prolifant scorer of centuries. Great talent.
4. Alan Border
Out of the Steve Waugh mould... actually Waugh is out of his Mould. The great credit to Border was he went 61 innings without making a century, yet his average for those innings was above 50. That's remarkable consistency. Border never threw his wicket away and would do anything to save it. If it's turning his back on a bouncer to get hit, so be it. It if means having the shortest backswing you'd ever seen and just pushing at the ball, he'd do it. "The little Aussie battler" that called him because he just never gave up. Don't look at his number on centuries because they don't show how consistent he was. Look at the number of runs he accumulated over his career.
5. Niel Harvey
He's a little overrated I feel. Harvey's legacy was being the one great Aussie batsman for quite a while. Because of that he stands out as great, because his contributions meant so much. I don't think his talent reveals the same mettle displayed by Waugh and Border.
But in fairness, Lara & Tendulkar were hardly over the hill in the early part of this century.I thought it was pretty well established that Sachin and Lara were past their prime in the past 5-6 years or so, whereas Ponting had just hit his prime. I don't think Ponting is much better than those guys were in their respective primes. I do believe the quality of the attacks is somewhat worse than it was in the 90s when Lara and Sachin were gunning it.
That said, I think its obvious Ponting will retire as a legend of the game.
Half an hour of Walters at Headingly in 81 would have been very handy, I think.Love Dougie and agree with you about his record, except his abject failures on his tours of England, which are unfortunately a blemish on his record that moves him out of the very top bracket. I have him in my 2nd XI for alltime Australia still, and would have him in a heartbeat if I was picking a team to enjoy watching, rather than to win, or if the match was going to be in Australia, not England.
I must admit at the time (I was14) I thought with GSC pulling out they should have taken Walters for his experience. He may have told Hughes not to enforce the follow onProbably, but as much as I hate to say it, by then he'd had a couple of chances to show he could perform in England and didn't take them...
Agreed - not sure he would have handled Willis that day any better than he had done on his previous tours. Sad as it is to say...Probably, but as much as I hate to say it, by then he'd had a couple of chances to show he could perform in England and didn't take them...
yeah, but surely it is not such a big wrong to place guys who have done almost just as well in tougher conditions against better bowlers a bit higher?Agreed, that's why I think the whole thing is overblown somewhat.