• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in England

adharcric

International Coach
Jungle Jumbo said:
Despite the dominance of bat over ball throughout much of the game, there was a genuine feeling at the beginning of play that India could still clinch an unprecedented victory.
Bit of a mix up there? :p
 

adharcric

International Coach
I would like to see:

Karthick+
Jaffer
Laxman
Dravid*
Tendulkar
Ganguly
Yuvraj
Zaheer
Kumble
RP Singh
Sreesanth

Dhoni out Yuvi in. More bowling options, more variety.

Laxman to his usual No.3 spot..
Haha, great. Drop your top-scorer for Yuvi's bowling?
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
I am always in favor of a specialist opener. Just because Dravid can defend and leave doesn't mean he is comfortable going out there without seeing how the pitch and the bowlers behave first. Yes, if he has to we can expect for him to switch, and undoubtedly he would for the betterment of the team.
It (Dravid opening) has its advantages and disadvantages. If there were only advantages, it would be an easy decision to make.

But he is your best player, why mess with the only thing in your entire lineup that is working? You will plug one hole but leave a bigger hole right below.
I see the holes filled bigger than the hole created. The opener problem which is huge would have a chance to be solved. Laxman could do well at 3 any ways.

Dravid as opener has a bad record but I would have given it a proper run years back. It is not an option right now though - it is like saying some one would want Badrinath in the middle order for the second test.
 
Last edited:

Raghav

International Vice-Captain
Why drop Dhoni when he topscored???
Dhoni was not good behind the stumps. Lets give Kaarthick a chance to keep this time. Yuvi can replace dhoni as both of them are same kind of aggressive players. Yuvi, can be a bit useful with the ball and provide good variety against spin-shaky english batsman. Good option in the lower order and very much composed cricketer who can be handy in the fielding too.

BTW, you can ask me , why not drop Laxman... Laxman is good batting at No.3. I would still back him up, if he bats high up the order he can bat well. He is a good slip fielder too. Give him another chance!
 
Last edited:

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
An amazing stat from cricinfo:

India were ultimately saved by the weather, but they did bat more doggedly than they usually do in the fourth innings - only five times in their entire Test history have they batted more than the 96 overs they did at Lord's.

For a team that has played Test cricket for so many decades, that is astounding(ly bad)!
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
An amazing stat from cricinfo:

India were ultimately saved by the weather, but they did bat more doggedly than they usually do in the fourth innings - only five times in their entire Test history have they batted more than the 96 overs they did at Lord's.

For a team that has played Test cricket for so many decades, that is astounding(ly bad)!
:O

That's pretty amazing.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Thats not a good reason to keep him around. If he does not perform, he should be dropped. The players are adults, and as far as Iwhat can be believed via ex-coaches, are all jealous of each other anyway.
 

open365

International Vice-Captain
Becuase not only is he a genius batsman, it would also bring down the whole morale of the team, because the person who has inspired many of them isn't around anymore.
Crap argument, you can't keep a player in the side under the pretence that he inspires others( bar Mike Brealey which i debate anyway), not when his performance is as bad as Tendulkar's has been in recent years.
 

Top