Xuhaib
International Coach
What he said.Knight couldn't quite destroy attacks with the regularity that Gilchrist does either. I think Knight could quite possibly better compared to Hayden.
What he said.Knight couldn't quite destroy attacks with the regularity that Gilchrist does either. I think Knight could quite possibly better compared to Hayden.
Nah, I don't think Richard rates Vaughan very highly.So first Hayden <<<<<<<<<<<<, Hussain
Now Gilchrist <<<Knight.
What Next Mcgrath <<<<Gough and Waugh <<< Vaughan ?
Haha, the most appropriate in the fact it was likely to cause an argument? You could've, and probably should've just said "I disagree" or something similar.I thought what Richard said about strike rates was crap so I said it was crap...live with it. Why should I have to go into detail about something so obvious. I thought my reply was the most appropriate so I'll stick with it thanks
Nah, I prefer "crap" in this instanceHaha, the most appropriate in the fact it was likely to cause an argument? You could've, and probably should've just said "I disagree" or something similar.
No, I wouldn't.Perm, you would argue with me if I told you the grass was green...
Don't argueNo, I wouldn't.
I think what Richard is trying to say is that strike rate is largely irrelevant as long as it is healthy, 70+, which isn't too slow to hinder the team.SR is still very important in ODI cricket. Are you seriously arguing, "as long as his SR is 70+, it doesn't matter what it is"? ****.
OK Richard JnrI think what Richard is trying to say is that strike rate is largely irrelevant as long as it is healthy, 70+, which isn't too slow to hinder the team.
Try telling that to Boeta Dippenaar, who despite scoring slowly was perhaps the best ODI opener South Africa have had in a while. More runs>fast runs.Yeah but the object of the ODI opener's role since 1996 WC has been to score as quickly as possible early doors.
Matthew Hayden, who has an average of almost 4 runs better than Knight? With a scoring rate that is faster than Knight?I think Knight could quite possibly better compared to Hayden.
Highlights your inability to have a decent discussion and lack of vocabulary, IMO.Nah, I prefer "crap" in this instance
Didn't he get dropped? Obviously wasn't doing the job in the right way in the opinion of the selectors.Try telling that to Boeta Dippenaar, who despite scoring slowly was perhaps the best ODI opener South Africa have had in a while. More runs>fast runs.
You obviously din't see the thread he made about him then...Nah, I don't think Richard rates Vaughan very highly.
A lack of runs and the quota system that South Africa apply conspired against Dippenaar, nothing to do with his scoring rate though.Didn't he get dropped? Obviously wasn't doing the job in the right way in the opinion of the selectors.
Care to point it out to me?You obviously din't see the thread he made about him then...
Highlights my apathy towards having "decent discussions" with some people more probably.Highlights your inability to have a decent discussion and lack of vocabulary, IMO.
Oh how I would just love to give you a game of Scrabble some day PermHighlights your inability to have a decent discussion and lack of vocabulary, IMO.
http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/showthread.php?t=24229 there ya go.Care to point it out to me?
Thread title certainly leaves no one in doubt