how about when Australia were 1-0 down in the Ashes series in England and were looking REAL badOK I'll make one comparison. Glenn McGrath, great as he is, IMO, couldn't redeem Australia in that 1999 semi final. He couldn't redeem them in Sri Lanka. He couldn't redeem them in the 2005 Ashes (though that may be unfair since he struggled for fitness). Not to say he didn't win Australia an absolute hoard of matches... but a truly great comeback that defends the Aussie reputation is something I don't recall seeing in the McGrath legacy. At Australia's most vital moments, the moments history remembers, Warne did it for Australia. I used McGrath as an example for comparison.
Isn't it a credit to McGrath that, in such a long career, against so many teams, he very rarely put the other team in a position where Warne's magic was required?OK I'll make one comparison. Glenn McGrath, great as he is, IMO, couldn't redeem Australia in that 1999 semi final. He couldn't redeem them in Sri Lanka. He couldn't redeem them in the 2005 Ashes (though that may be unfair since he struggled for fitness). Not to say he didn't win Australia an absolute hoard of matches... but a truly great comeback that defends the Aussie reputation is something I don't recall seeing in the McGrath legacy. At Australia's most vital moments, the moments history remembers, Warne did it for Australia. I used McGrath as an example for comparison. But I honestly have never seen any other cricketer, be it a batsman or bowler, in my entire life, who could rise to the occasion.
But then you can't really ignore the times Warne did have the chance and failed. Like vs. India, where McGrath really succeeded, whether in India or in Australia vs India.OK I'll make one comparison. Glenn McGrath, great as he is, IMO, couldn't redeem Australia in that 1999 semi final. He couldn't redeem them in Sri Lanka. He couldn't redeem them in the 2005 Ashes (though that may be unfair since he struggled for fitness). Not to say he didn't win Australia an absolute hoard of matches... but a truly great comeback that defends the Aussie reputation is something I don't recall seeing in the McGrath legacy. At Australia's most vital moments, the moments history remembers, Warne did it for Australia. I used McGrath as an example for comparison. But I honestly have never seen any other cricketer, be it a batsman or bowler, in my entire life, who could rise to the occasion.
It's hard for me to judge, but I agree with you, if you criticise McGrath on times he failed to "step up" you must also criticise Warne. As great was Warne was in the 05 Ashes I feel a different performance by him on Day 5 of Test 5 could've produced a different result. Let's not forget the fielding either.But then you can't really ignore the times Warne did have the chance and failed. Like vs. India, where McGrath really succeeded, whether in India or in Australia vs India.
No one will ever convince me that Warne > McGrath.
I never said I don't give it to Warne, but one has to simply look at Warne's record without McGrath, and the other way around to start to get a feel. Perhaps the records aren't really representative, but I think they tell a lot on how they depended on each other.It's hard for me to judge, but I agree with you, if you criticise McGrath on times he failed to "step up" you must also criticise Warne. As great was Warne was in the 05 Ashes I feel a different performance by him on Day 5 of Test 5 could've produced a different result. Let's not forget the fielding either.
McGrath is just outstanding. One of the finest bowlers of all time. That's taking away nothing from Warne of course, but I'm saying if you wanna give it to Pidge you have to give it to Warne a bit too. Of course neither are immortal, you can't expect them to do it everytime.
Yes, sorry, I was referring to Francis rather than you. I was using your post as a point of reference in regards to Warne not always stepping up.I never said I don't give it to Warne, but one has to simply look at Warne's record without McGrath, and the other way around to start to get a feel. Perhaps the records aren't really representative, but I think they tell a lot on how they depended on each other.
Very much so IMO, under-rated by most cricket fans around the world (Hingston excepted)Donald - underrated?.![]()
1.Bradman-- no explanation needed
2.Sobers----- ditto
3.May--------- a gentleman of the first order..brilliant bat/tactician
4.Hutton-------the greatest opener of all time?
5.Warne-------701 Test wickets speak for themselves
6.Imran--------Pakistans best ever Captain and allrounded cricketer
7.lloyd---------Leader of the most dominant side in world cricket for quite a few years
8Grout---------Solid team man handy bat ..best gloveman the Aussies have had
9.Lillee---------All heart,great fast bowler/competitor
10.Trueman--Maybe the best fast bowler England has produced
11.Miller[K]---Fantastic all rounder,new ball bowler,Captain of the 2nd AIF team to play in England as the first test match after the war in 1946
I have seen all bar Hutton play.Could make a second eleven which would give even that side a run for their money and include the likes of Benaud,Dexter,Graveney,D'oliviera,Richards etc etc etc.
Where does Hadlee rank for you JBMAC?1.Bradman-- no explanation needed
2.Sobers----- ditto
3.May--------- a gentleman of the first order..brilliant bat/tactician
4.Hutton-------the greatest opener of all time?
5.Warne-------701 Test wickets speak for themselves
6.Imran--------Pakistans best ever Captain and allrounded cricketer
7.lloyd---------Leader of the most dominant side in world cricket for quite a few years
8Grout---------Solid team man handy bat ..best gloveman the Aussies have had
9.Lillee---------All heart,great fast bowler/competitor
10.Trueman--Maybe the best fast bowler England has produced
11.Miller[K]---Fantastic all rounder,new ball bowler,Captain of the 2nd AIF team to play in England as the first test match after the war in 1946
I have seen all bar Hutton play.Could make a second eleven which would give even that side a run for their money and include the likes of Benaud,Dexter,Graveney,D'oliviera,Richards etc etc etc.
Fair enough...he's still in mineSir Richard Hadlee would be one of those players in my second eleven,Fiery.There have been so many great players since 1946 and pre 1939 that when comparing these eras one needs to take into account what the playing conditions etc were at that time.Comparisons can be dangerous ie someone of 20-30 years of age would be saying Tendulkar is the greatest batsman of all time..someone in their 30-40 would be saying Border or Gavaskar.Someone in my age group would be saying Harvey,O'Neill etc etc.
Hadlee was a fine competitor and a fierce opponent but could he have stacked up with those in my first eleven? I don't think so.
Wally Grout was a real rough diamond with a heart of gold and a great keeper.I think he held the record for the most dissmissals in an innings for quite a number of years if i remember correctly.It might have been Goddard who broke that record.You are sure testing the old grey matter now.Never had the opporyunity to see Hutton but I would still rank him as the best opener of all time.Miller was everything aussies wanted after the war Rugged,good looking,War hero[flew spitfires/hurricanes in Battle of Britain},Team Man and a bloody fast bowler who could hit up a quick 50-100 runs in no time at all.Wally Grout, the Grizz, great to see his name on one of these lists.
Surprised you watched Miller but not Hutton, but even still I envy you![]()
Surprised you would rate Grout higher than Rod Marsh tbhWally Grout was a real rough diamond with a heart of gold and a great keeper.I think he held the record for the most dissmissals in an innings for quite a number of years if i remember correctly.It might have been Goddard who broke that record.You are sure testing the old grey matter now.Never had the opporyunity to see Hutton but I would still rank him as the best opener of all time.Miller was everything aussies wanted after the war Rugged,good looking,War hero[flew spitfires/hurricanes in Battle of Britain},Team Man and a bloody fast bowler who could hit up a quick 50-100 runs in no time at all.
I've always been a believer in that old cliche there is no "I" in the word team.Marshy was good but when it came to autographs/PR for the game etc it was always "What's in it for me?"Surprised you would rate Grout higher than Rod Marsh tbh