nightprowler10
Global Moderator
Is the list specific to a certain format of the sport?
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
New Cricket Trivia - 'SJS format'
- Thread starter JASON
- Start date
SJS
Hall of Fame Member
nightprowler10
Global Moderator
Think you may have it.Does it relate to hundreds in Tests ?
SJS
Hall of Fame Member
NODoes it relate to hundreds in Tests ?
SJS
Hall of Fame Member
Brian Lara and Shane Warne are at the opposite ends of which uncommon list ?
Q1. "highest and lowest first class averages for leg spin bowlers"?........NO
Q2: Is it a list that relates to each of their respective batting abilities?.....Hmmmmm...Yes
Q3. Highest and lowest individual scores among those who have scored more than 3000 runs (ie, 400 and 99) ? ......NO
Q4. Does it involve ducks? ....NO
Q5. Is the list specific to a certain format of the sport? ....Yes
Q6. Does it relate to hundreds in Tests ? .....NO
Early Hint : It refers to performance on the field in test matches.
Q1. "highest and lowest first class averages for leg spin bowlers"?........NO
Q2: Is it a list that relates to each of their respective batting abilities?.....Hmmmmm...Yes
Q3. Highest and lowest individual scores among those who have scored more than 3000 runs (ie, 400 and 99) ? ......NO
Q4. Does it involve ducks? ....NO
Q5. Is the list specific to a certain format of the sport? ....Yes
Q6. Does it relate to hundreds in Tests ? .....NO
Early Hint : It refers to performance on the field in test matches.
Fiery
Banned
Yes
Is SJS coming back ?
I am proposing a change to SJS format. Because of the long drawn out format ...its taking longer and the thread lies dormat.
How about this -
Restrict to only 5 (meaningful and genuine) questions to decipher the Answer. If this is unsuccessful, the questioner must provide the answer and then post another question.
So its in the interests of the Questioner that the answer becomes clear at the end of 5 questions. I feel this change may let this thread run a little faster . Want the thoughts of you guys , particularly SJS, Tapioca, Archie Mac ,and others .
I am proposing a change to SJS format. Because of the long drawn out format ...its taking longer and the thread lies dormat.
How about this -
Restrict to only 5 (meaningful and genuine) questions to decipher the Answer. If this is unsuccessful, the questioner must provide the answer and then post another question.
So its in the interests of the Questioner that the answer becomes clear at the end of 5 questions. I feel this change may let this thread run a little faster . Want the thoughts of you guys , particularly SJS, Tapioca, Archie Mac ,and others .
archie mac
International Coach
Needs something but I think five is to short. Maybe we could have more than one question going at the same time?
But that could cause real confusion, if we had 2 questions going at the same time.
archie mac
International Coach
I remember it happening once before, Jamee 999 became sick of waiting for someone to work out one of my silly questions and he asked his own
It went okay. Maybe we could start another thread call SJS format 2?
Wouldn't that be one too many trivia threads ...I remember it happening once before, Jamee 999 became sick of waiting for someone to work out one of my silly questions and he asked his own
It went okay. Maybe we could start another thread call SJS format 2?
There's not enough Trivia enthusiasts to keep 3 threads going IMO.
archie mac
International Coach
Okay, well how about we just make it, if the person asking the question does not respond within 24 hours, someone else just asks a new questionWouldn't that be one too many trivia threads ...
There's not enough Trivia enthusiasts to keep 3 threads going IMO.
That seems right to me.Okay, well how about we just make it, if the person asking the question does not respond within 24 hours, someone else just asks a new question
archie mac
International Coach
Question
He was part of an extremely enviable and possibly unmatchable record , but unfortunately he is not the record holder . He was the "Most unfortunate one" in this record . And its extremely unlikely that anyone else will ever have the same fate that befell him.
Who is he ? What's the record ? Who is the record holder ? Why was he the "unfortunate one" ? Why is the record possibly unmatchable ?
He was part of an extremely enviable and possibly unmatchable record , but unfortunately he is not the record holder . He was the "Most unfortunate one" in this record . And its extremely unlikely that anyone else will ever have the same fate that befell him.
Who is he ? What's the record ? Who is the record holder ? Why was he the "unfortunate one"
? Why is the record possibly unmatchable ?
archie mac
International Coach
Was he bowling to the holder of this record?