Don't mean to sound insensitive but it seems way OTT imo, he was in the job for less than a year and oversaw one of the worst WCs ever not to mention the horrible handling of the Ovalgate crisis. Plus you have the yellow thingy on their other arm for that missing girl which is ridiculous in its own right, I mean cmon it's getting absurd.Yep, for the memory of Percy Sonn.
Well, as the guy from cricinfo pointed out, they dont have armbands, just pieces of blacktape wrapped around the arm part of the shirt.Don't mean to sound insensitive but it seems way OTT imo, he was in the job for less than a year and oversaw one of the worst WCs ever not to mention the horrible handling of the Ovalgate crisis. Plus you have the yellow thingy on their other arm for that missing girl which is ridiculous in its own right, I mean cmon it's getting absurd.
He doesn't need to.Oh, ffs, honestly if this carries on, they've got to drop Harmison, it's getting beyond a joke. A pitch that's doing everything, against a clueless team, and he still can't trouble them
Samuels should have been there from the start imo.If sarwan does go home who do they call up?
Samuels?
try and coax mr Lara out of retirement
I agree.I have nothing but respect for Bravo. The shining light in this woeful side.
Discipline issues stopped his selection I think.Samuels should have been there from the start imo.
Running out Brian Lara in his last match, if you're a real conspiracy theoristsDiscipline issues stopped his selection I think.
As in he had too much discipline to be a WI batsman?Discipline issues stopped his selection I think.
That's not the consensus here. Usually there'd be reports of him giving trouble but this time around there's been no such thing making his non-selection more mysterious. Wasn't for cricket reasons and doesn't seem to have been disciplinary.Discipline issues stopped his selection I think.
When it was brought up on Sky Sports, Holding seemed extremely reluctant to say anything and changed the subject immediately, to which the other commentators obliged. Mysterious indeed.That's not the consensus here. Usually there'd be reports of him giving trouble but this time around there's been no such thing making his non-selection more mysterious. Wasn't for cricket reasons and doesn't seem to have been disciplinary.
There was that match fixing thing, but that was before the WC so since he wasn't dropped for that he obviously wouldn't be dropped for this either for that reason, although that seems to have been swept under the rug for better or worse.That's not the consensus here. Usually there'd be reports of him giving trouble but this time around there's been no such thing making his non-selection more mysterious. Wasn't for cricket reasons and doesn't seem to have been disciplinary.