Probably about 15-20mins I'd say.263-8 all up
How longs the break inbetween innings ?
if you are 160/2 before the 30 over stage, with two set batsmen in the process of of 130 run partnership, I dont care who you are playing and what pitch you are on, you are on top.They were going alright when Bell and Pietersen were batting, wouldn't say they were on top and they were certainly never on top at any point in the 2nd innings
Yes, really good batting from McCullum and Franklin have spared our blushes really. 45 off the last 3 overs.it will be too much for ireland to get now...surely At the end, NZ havent done that a bad job TBH!
Franklin's bowling is below average, has been for a while now.This is the reason Franklin gets the nod above our other average bowlers, like I said he is no mug.
I'll agree that the scorecard looked pretty good at 160/2 but you always knew Aus were capable of swinging the momentum and from that point on it was all Australia. They cruised towards the target without ever having to do anything risky during their inningsif you are 160/2 before the 30 over stage, with two set batsmen in the process of of 130 run partnership, I dont care who you are playing and what pitch you are on, you are on top.
And whilst they might not have been favourites at any point during the second innings it was not inconceivable that England could win ever after the half way stage of that innings, that all I am saying.
There is a massive difference between losing by a couple of overs and losing by 90 runs.(like SA did)
Yeah, thats why i hate it.Yeah most likely he was out, but the benefit of doubt had to go the batsman.