Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
And that was a very poor performance.the aussies couldn't dismiss him in cardiff and neither was england able to the next game against bd
And that was a very poor performance.the aussies couldn't dismiss him in cardiff and neither was england able to the next game against bd
oh, i though your talking about being dropped from the team or something....but well then most batsmen have a lot of runs they do not deserve than because i reckon most have been droppen at least once here and thereMaking a comeback? What's that to do with anything?
Any runs scored after being dropped (or having some other form of let-off) have not been earnt the way those scored without being let-off have been.
guess the 100 he score in the test against sri alnka was a very poor performance as well? Also i think its a poor performance when you let any batsmen get a 100 anyways...And that was a very poor performance.
Obviously they have, yes. There are more than a few innings where more runs are scored than should have been.oh, i though your talking about being dropped from the team or something....but well then most batsmen have a lot of runs they do not deserve than because i reckon most have been droppen at least once here and there
Anyone who allows Mohammad Ashraful to score a notable score has put in a very poor performance indeed.guess the 100 he score in the test against sri alnka was a very poor performance as well? Also i think its a poor performance when you let any batsmen get a 100 anyways...
What is it about Mohammad Ashraful that you don't like? Do you not think he is that talented, or what?Anyone who allows Mohammad Ashraful to score a notable score has put in a very poor performance indeed.
This comment in particular, utter twaddle, so if a player Richard doesn't like scores runs its a poor bowling performanceAnyone who allows Mohammad Ashraful to score a notable score has put in a very poor performance indeed.
i don't see a point in replying to this but, anyone who allows any batsmen to score a 100 is putting a poor performance.Anyone who allows Mohammad Ashraful to score a notable score has put in a very poor performance indeed.
Not always the case, in some occasions the bowling was been spot on but the batsman has been "in the zone".i don't see a point in replying to this but, anyone who allows any batsmen to score a 100 is putting a poor performance.
I don't rate Ashraful either, but he really played a fantastic innings. It was a classy knock and won Bangladesh the game.Anyone who allows Mohammad Ashraful to score a notable score has put in a very poor performance indeed.
Since his return, he has been given the primary job to hold the lower-middle oreder together. So him scoring over 50 in itself is not always possible, so the 20+s and 30s that he has been scoring is good enough for Bangladesh! However, he does have all the shots in the book and when he gets a partner at the other end for quite a while, he can take off (like he did today).....so it is not necessary that we would see a slump in his form but it is also not necessarily so that we would see hims core so big UNLESS he comes higher up the order like today.....he has it in him to become the best batsmen in the world, but just loses it so bad most of the time.....it's simply depressing .....everytime he scores good, if the toher batsmen put in a good effort, BD wins or comes very close to winning *sigh*.....hope he is consistent from here on !!!!!he's been consistent since he came back to the team...
What's the point being a member on a Cricket Forum if you don't want to here other people's opinions?For f*** sake Richard!
keep your opinions to yourself please.
No one wants to here them.